On 27/03/2011 0.03, Georg Brandl wrote:
On 26.03.2011 20:19, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
Am 26.03.2011 20:00, schrieb Terry Reedy:
On 3/26/2011 2:17 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Refactor doesn't sound like it belongs in the 3.1 branch...
-for i in range(len(pattern)):
-c =
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
I believe you need to add MULE to it.) Is there some reason such messages
can't
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
s...@pobox.com wrote:
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
I believe you need
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:21:08PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
s...@pobox.com wrote:
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
use VM within XEmacs.
Antoine Hmm, are you sure? Software (especially mail-reading software)
Antoine that doesn't support utf-8 in 2011 should be considered
Antoine extremely broken.
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii symbols are used?
Eugene
On 27.03.2011 18:33, Jon Ribbens wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 05:21:08PM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 10:06:49 -0500
s...@pobox.com wrote:
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 17:33:04 +0100, Jon Ribbens wrote:
In my experience it is very difficult to get a whole system
configured, such that UTF-8 works reliably. In my case that would
mean, I think, Linux, glibc, mutt, screen, elinks, and SecureCRT would
all have to simultaneously be configured
Am 27.03.2011 17:06, schrieb s...@pobox.com:
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail reader. (I
use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support utf-8 out of the box.
I believe you need to add MULE
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:13:29PM -0400, Eugene Toder wrote:
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Isn't utf-8 itself same as
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:21:25PM -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
Mind you, I've never managed to get the -- button working reliably
either, but to be fair that's insanely complicated too.
No idea what that is.
Backspace key.
___
Python-Dev
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of
mail reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible
(read: fairly easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Eugene Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii symbols are
Martin Am 27.03.2011 17:06, schrieb s...@pobox.com:
It seems that all checkin mails are utf-8-encoded. This makes it
challenging to view checkin mails if you have a text-based mail
reader. (I use VM within XEmacs. XEmacs doesn't seem to support
utf-8 out of the box. I
On 3/27/2011 2:13 PM, Eugene Toder wrote:
I'm not disputing that, and I understand that my current choice of mail
reader limits me. I was just asking if it would be possible (read: fairly
easy) to only generate utf-8 when it was necessary.
Isn't utf-8 itself same as ascii where no non-ascii
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 19:46:35 +0100, Jon Ribbens
jon+python-...@unequivocal.co.uk wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 02:21:25PM -0400, R. David Murray wrote:
Mind you, I've never managed to get the -- button working reliably
either, but to be fair that's insanely complicated too.
No idea
Trying to compile and install Python 2.7 on irix 6.5.22 IP22 (N32 ABI
model), Using gcc-4.5.1 and binutils 2.20.1. Everything goes well (I
applied th patches listed at:
http://bugs.python.org/file15915/python-2.7-irix.patch )
It compiles and the test mostly work except for the callback
Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
What is rebase? Why does everyone want it and hate it at the same time?
It's the same thing that happens when you do a svn up with local
changes in your checkout. Logically, your patch gets modified so
that it applies on a different (newer) version of
Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
I'm asking because I don't know hg and git well enough to answer the
question. In my own use of Bazaar over the last 4+ years, I've almost never
rebased or even been asked to.
Maybe it depends on what kind of changes you commit. I consider
future
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 6:52 PM, raymond.hettinger
python-check...@python.org wrote:
-.. function:: accumulate(iterable)
+.. function:: accumulate(iterable[, func])
Make an iterator that returns accumulated sums. Elements may be any
addable
-type including :class:`Decimal` or
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 2:11 PM, Daniel Stutzbach stutzb...@google.com wrote:
Is there a good use-case for the func argument? I can only think of bad
use-cases (where func does something that does not remotely resemble
addition). I fear that people will actually implement these bad use-cases,
20 matches
Mail list logo
