On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 16:07, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com wrote:
Several of the PSF blogs hosted on Google's Blogger platform are experiencing
issues as fallout from the recent maintenance problems they had. We have
already had to recreate at least one of the translations for
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 16:07, Doug Hellmann doug.hellm...@gmail.com wrote:
Several of the PSF blogs hosted on Google's Blogger platform are
experiencing issues as fallout from the recent maintenance problems they
had. We
There's a thread on python-list at the moment:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2011-May/1272505.html
which is discussing the validity of os.access results on
Windows. Now we've been here before: I raised issue2528
for a previous enquiry some years ago and proffered a patch
which
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
This behavior matches what I was imagining for having
b'a' == 97. They compare equal, yet remain distinct objects
for all other purposes.
If anybody has a link to or an explanation why equal values must be equal
hashes
With respect to Google Blogger, I don't see a good reason to use it as
the platform for the blog.
As with any infrastructure, there is a reasonably high cost in
changing, as people have become used to a certain way of doing things,
and porting the contents from the old system to the new one
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 5:39 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
With respect to Google Blogger, I don't see a good reason to use it as
the platform for the blog.
As with any infrastructure, there is a reasonably high cost in
changing, as people have become used to a certain way of
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:38, Tim Golden tim.gol...@cbsoutdoor.co.ukwrote:
There's a thread on python-list at the moment:
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2011-May/1272505.html
which is discussing the validity of os.access results on
Windows. Now we've been here before: I
On 20/05/2011 16:21, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:38, Tim Golden tim.gol...@cbsoutdoor.co.uk
(Sorry about that; I had no idea I'd sent that from my work account)
I think we should tread lightly in the documentation area. We already
have two note boxes, and adding a third
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Georg Brandl g.bra...@gmx.net wrote:
On 19.05.2011 13:35, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
Hey
I've pushed packaging in stdlib. There are a few buildbots errors
we're fixing right now.
We will continue our work in their directly for now on.
Rock on!
Thanks :)
Still
There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another hosted by
someone else site is probably not a good idea, but our hands may be
forced if google/blogger can
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 7:39 PM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
Has the Python insider blog really accumulated enough history and
cruft to make this move problematic? It's a fairly new blog, with not
much content in it. From my blogging experience, Blogger has other
limitations which
On Sat, May 21, 2011 at 1:35 AM, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another hosted by
someone else site is probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/20/2011 11:35 AM, Eli Bendersky wrote:
There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another hosted by
someone
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-05-13 - 2011-05-20)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open2794 (+10)
closed 21115 (+46)
total 23909 (+56)
Open issues
On May 20, 2011 8:30 AM, Tim Golden m...@timgolden.me.uk wrote:
On 20/05/2011 16:21, Brian Curtin wrote:
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 03:38, Tim Golden tim.gol...@cbsoutdoor.co.uk
(Sorry about that; I had no idea I'd sent that from my work account)
I think we should tread lightly in the
Hi,
My name is Charles-François Natali, I've been using Python for a
couple years, and I've recently been granted commit priviledge.
I just wanted to say hi to everyone on this list, and let you know
that I'm really happy and proud of joining this great community.
Cheers,
cf
Hi,
since May 19, I get the exception below in the latest py3k site.py when
trying to run a distutils build with it (building Cython). The changelog
since the previous (working) CPython build is here:
https://sage.math.washington.edu:8091/hudson/job/py3k-hg/374/
The failing build is here:
On 20.05.2011 17:35, Eli Bendersky wrote:
There is ongoing work for an RFP by the board to improve the
python.org publishing system/site to allow us to self-host these
things. Moving PSF properties off of it, and onto another hosted by
someone else site is probably not a good idea, but our
As Jesse has said, there is an RFP in development to improve
python.org to the point where we can self-host blogs and the like and
deal with the associated user account administration appropriately.
To run a blog on www.python.org, a PEP is not needed. If anybody would
volunteer to set this
TBH I think the less attractive we can make os.access() look the
better. It uses the real uid instead of the effective uid, it
encourages LBYL behavior, the outcome may be incorrect, it doesn't
work on Windows... The ONLY reason to ever use it is in a setuid()
program. But who writes those
On May 20, 2011, at 5:47 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote:
As Jesse has said, there is an RFP in development to improve
python.org to the point where we can self-host blogs and the like and
deal with the associated user account administration appropriately.
To run a blog on www.python.org, a PEP
Hello to all you Pythoneers and Pythonistas,
I'm happy to announce the availability of Python 2.6.7 release candidate 2.
Release candidate 1 was not widely announced due to a mismatch between the
Mercurial and Subversion branches. Barring any unforeseen issues, this will
be the last release
In article ir6e0i$hn6$1...@dough.gmane.org,
Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
since May 19, I get the exception below in the latest py3k site.py when
trying to run a distutils build with it (building Cython). The changelog
since the previous (working) CPython build is here:
On Fri, 2011-05-20 at 19:01 +0200, Charles-François Natali wrote:
Hi,
My name is Charles-François Natali, I've been using Python for a
couple years, and I've recently been granted commit priviledge.
I just wanted to say hi to everyone on this list, and let you know
that I'm really happy and
24 matches
Mail list logo
