Re: [Python-Dev] time.sleep(-1) behaviour

2011-06-30 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
On Thursday 30 June 2011, R. David Murray wrote: > Please file a bug report at bugs.python.org. Filed as bug #12459. Uli ** Domino Laser GmbH, Fangdieckstraße 75a, 22547 Hamburg, Deutschland Geschäftsführer: Thor

Re: [Python-Dev] commant

2011-06-30 Thread Bernie Bill
and thanks!! lederbill ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation

2011-06-30 Thread Mark Hammond
On 30/06/2011 10:09 PM, Vinay Sajip wrote: There's a lot to like in the PEP, and I have some questions relating to the latest version: 1. In the section on shebang line parsing, it says "If the command starts with the definition of a customized command followed by a space character, the customiz

Re: [Python-Dev] svn.python.org confusion

2011-06-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 1:40 AM, Tres Seaver wrote: > On 06/30/2011 10:32 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >> I'm not against adding this to svn, but please be sure these files don't leak >> into the tarballs should we need to cut another 2.5 or 2.6 release.  I think >> that just means tweaking sandbox/rele

Re: [Python-Dev] time.sleep(-1) behaviour

2011-06-30 Thread Victor Stinner
Le jeudi 30 juin 2011 à 21:13 +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt a écrit : > Hi! > > This is a request for clarification for the thread "how to call a function > for > evry 10 seconds" from the user mailinglist/newsgroup. > > > The gist is this: > 1. On Linux/Python 2.6, time.sleep(-1.0) raises an IOError

Re: [Python-Dev] time.sleep(-1) behaviour

2011-06-30 Thread R. David Murray
On Thu, 30 Jun 2011 21:13:46 +0200, Ulrich Eckhardt wrote: > 1. Is the IOError somehow explainable? > 2. Is the IOError acceptable or a bug? > 3. Is the behaviour under MS Windows acceptable or a bug? > 4. Since time.sleep() is documented to possibly sleep a bit longer than > specified, someone

[Python-Dev] time.sleep(-1) behaviour

2011-06-30 Thread Ulrich Eckhardt
Hi! This is a request for clarification for the thread "how to call a function for evry 10 seconds" from the user mailinglist/newsgroup. The gist is this: 1. On Linux/Python 2.6, time.sleep(-1.0) raises an IOError. 2. On MS Windows/Python 2.5 or 2.7 this sleeps forever. It seems that convertin

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation

2011-06-30 Thread Jeff Hardy
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 4:13 AM, Michael Foord wrote: > In the latest update Mark also addressed my main concern, making the > launcher configurable so it can also be used by alternative implementations > (particularly IronPython for Windows). I've copied Jeff Hardy and Dino > (IronPython maintain

Re: [Python-Dev] svn.python.org confusion

2011-06-30 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 06/30/2011 10:32 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Jun 30, 2011, at 04:17 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: > >> Adding a THIS_REPOSITORY_HAS_MOVED file to recent branches looks good. > > I'm not against adding this to svn, but please be sure these files don't le

Re: [Python-Dev] svn.python.org confusion

2011-06-30 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jun 30, 2011, at 04:17 PM, Éric Araujo wrote: >Adding a THIS_REPOSITORY_HAS_MOVED file to recent branches looks good. I'm not against adding this to svn, but please be sure these files don't leak into the tarballs should we need to cut another 2.5 or 2.6 release. I think that just means tweak

Re: [Python-Dev] svn.python.org confusion

2011-06-30 Thread Éric Araujo
Adding a THIS_REPOSITORY_HAS_MOVED file to recent branches looks good. Regards ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation

2011-06-30 Thread Paul Moore
On 30 June 2011 12:13, Michael Foord wrote: > I have that email (the update one from Mark not the silent nodding from Tim) > still sitting in my inbox waiting for me to properly read through and > comment on... Sorry for being useless, I'll try and move it up the priority > list. > > I really like

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation

2011-06-30 Thread Vinay Sajip
Mark Hammond gmail.com> writes: > Not yet - my last update of the PEP has made the existing reference > implementation out-of-date, so I want to work on that before starting on > the C version. However, seeing as my note about the most recent PEP > update attracted zero comments, I admit I lo

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation

2011-06-30 Thread Michael Foord
On 30/06/2011 08:34, Tim Golden wrote: On 30/06/2011 05:23, Mark Hammond wrote: On 30/06/2011 3:00 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote: PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) has a reference implementation in Python. Does anyone know of a C implementation, or is planning/working on one? I realise this is the

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: store the current scope on the stack right away

2011-06-30 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 1:53 PM, benjamin.peterson wrote: > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/151142c0c5b1 > changeset:   71087:151142c0c5b1 > parent:      71084:9aa3fcab76f0 > user:        Benjamin Peterson > date:        Wed Jun 29 22:52:39 2011 -0500 > summary: >  store the current scope on the

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) reference implementation

2011-06-30 Thread Tim Golden
On 30/06/2011 05:23, Mark Hammond wrote: On 30/06/2011 3:00 AM, Vinay Sajip wrote: PEP 397 (Python launcher for Windows) has a reference implementation in Python. Does anyone know of a C implementation, or is planning/working on one? I realise this is the final objective, so such implementation