On Jul 30, 2011, at 11:28 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>
> (Also, there must have been some reason to make "..." available everywhere
> for Python 3.)
>
It's really nice for stub functions:
def foo(x):
...
Raymond
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Pytho
On 07/30/11 19:25, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2011/7/30 Georg Brandl :
>> On 07/30/11 17:00, benjamin.peterson wrote:
>>> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/402f94edf11b
>>> changeset: 71637:402f94edf11b
>>> branch: 2.7
>>> user:Benjamin Peterson
>>> date:Sat Jul 30 09:59:12 2
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:11:08PM +0300, Ezio Melotti wrote:
> >-.. class:: SMTP(host='', port=0, local_hostname=None[, timeout])
> >+.. class:: SMTP(host='', port=0, local_hostname=None[, timeout],
> >source_address=None)
>
> The "[, timeout]" now looks weird there, and it would be better to
>
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
why would you use Ellipsis outside of slices?
I could imagine someone wanting to use it as part of a
function API. For example,
print(a, b, c, ...)
would have been a nice way to tell print() not to put
a newline on the end.
--
Greg
___
Hi,
On 30/07/2011 5.58, senthil.kumaran wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/26839edf3cc1
changeset: 71617:26839edf3cc1
parent: 71613:018e14a46454
user:Senthil Kumaran
date:Sat Jul 30 10:56:50 2011 +0800
summary:
Fix closes Issue11281 - smtplib.STMP gets source_addre
Hi,
On 29/07/2011 15.35, eric.araujo wrote:
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/1521d9837d16
changeset: 71569:1521d9837d16
user:Éric Araujo
date:Thu Jul 28 23:35:29 2011 +0200
summary:
Modernize modulefinder module and tests a bit.
The tests don’t use an internal distutils fun
2011/7/30 Georg Brandl :
> On 07/30/11 17:00, benjamin.peterson wrote:
>> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/402f94edf11b
>> changeset: 71637:402f94edf11b
>> branch: 2.7
>> user: Benjamin Peterson
>> date: Sat Jul 30 09:59:12 2011 -0500
>> summary:
>> note Ellipsis syntax
>>
>
On 07/30/11 17:03, benjamin.peterson wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/4a07b772f0e0
> changeset: 71639:4a07b772f0e0
> user:Benjamin Peterson
> date:Sat Jul 30 10:03:09 2011 -0500
> summary:
> we can call singleton types now
>
> files:
> Doc/library/stdtypes.rst | 8
On 07/30/11 17:00, benjamin.peterson wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/402f94edf11b
> changeset: 71637:402f94edf11b
> branch: 2.7
> user:Benjamin Peterson
> date:Sat Jul 30 09:59:12 2011 -0500
> summary:
> note Ellipsis syntax
>
> files:
> Doc/library/stdtypes.r
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:30 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> And on that note... was there any particular reason for leaving
> NotImplemented out for this change?
Never mind, just noticed the subsequest checkin.
Cheers,
Nick.
--
Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
___
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 6:08 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Wasn't this change only in 3.3 where __nonzero__ doesn't exist? So when PyPy
> eventually supports Python 3 they will have to update to support __bool__ on
> None but this test won't exercise that for them. IOW I think the guard is
> wrong and
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 31, 2011, at 01:23 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>>It sounds to me like you're really objecting to the devguide living in
>>a separate clone. This doesn't bode well for the prospects of ever
>>splitting the stdlib out from the CPython inter
On Jul 31, 2011, at 01:23 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>It sounds to me like you're really objecting to the devguide living in
>a separate clone. This doesn't bode well for the prospects of ever
>splitting the stdlib out from the CPython interpreter core...
Actually, no. I'm objecting to moving docum
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2011/7/29 Georg Brandl :
>> Shouldn't there be a matching Doc change somewhere?
>
> Somewhere is the question!
While None/NotImplemented/Ellipsis are all documented as singletons,
the behaviour of calling their types is not specified an
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:49 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 30, 2011, at 01:02 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> If test.support is truly and only an internal implementation detail, then it
> should adhere to Pythonic convention for such things, and be renamed
> test._support. Then you won't need to do
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 14:57, Éric Araujo wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:58, P.J. Eby wrote:
>>> For those implementing PEP \302 importer objects:
>>
>> the '\' should be removed, right?
>
> No. Philip used backslashes to prevent the HTML conversion to transform
> each and every instance
2011/7/29 Georg Brandl :
> Am 30.07.2011 01:20, schrieb benjamin.peterson:
>> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/84c3be27b4c7
>> changeset: 71614:84c3be27b4c7
>> parent: 71611:a6afd26caa8a
>> user: Benjamin Peterson
>> date: Fri Jul 29 18:19:43 2011 -0500
>> summary:
>> make t
Hello Antoine,
On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 08:46:00AM +0200, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> (I know PEP 8 is not always followed in old code, but there's no reason
> not to follow it in code that we add to the stdlib)
>
Thanks for pointing out. I somehow overlooked it. I shall refactor
that lib.
> Unles
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 09:25:27 -0400
Terry Reedy wrote:
> >
> > I'm sorry, can you be more precise. The effect of what?
>
> Your proposal to remove the current formatted documentation of
> test.support instead of completing it and force all developers to only
> have reference to the docstrings sc
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 06:30:40 +0300, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> This mail can appear as if advocating the transfer of Lib/test into Tests/,
> but this is not my intention here. Honest :-) I'm just trying to understand
> the history and rationale behind this structure in the CPython project.
My underst
On 7/29/2011 7:27 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 19:02:32 -0400
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 7/29/2011 5:32 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 11:51:18 -0400
Barry Warsaw wrote:
The solution then is to rename test.support to test._support to make it clear
it's an intern
On 7/29/2011 6:54 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jul 2011 18:47:07 -0400
Terry Reedy wrote:
And test.support *is* for internal use.
No, the stuff in there is *not* for internal use within the module but
for external use is possiby every test module.
I meant internal use for us. Real
Hi Sandro,
> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:58, P.J. Eby wrote:
>> For those implementing PEP \302 importer objects:
>
> the '\' should be removed, right?
No. Philip used backslashes to prevent the HTML conversion to transform
each and every instance of “PEP \d+” to a link, which gets annoying
aft
Hi,
sorry for nitpicking, but...
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:58, P.J. Eby wrote:
...
> For those implementing PEP \302 importer objects:
the '\' should be removed, right?
Cheers,
--
Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
Me at Debian: http://
Am 27.07.2011 19:47, schrieb Terry Reedy:
> On 7/27/2011 1:27 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>> Perhaps what we could do is move the documentation for test.support to
>> the devguide, and then vet the test suite so that unlink and friends
>> are always called as 'support.unlink', etc.
>>
>>
Am 27.07.2011 19:44, schrieb Terry Reedy:
> On 7/27/2011 9:24 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>> Docstrings are sufficient for own our purposes.
>
> >>> import test.support as t
> >>> help(t.rmtree)
> Help on function rmtree in module test.support:
>
> rmtree(path)
Well, what are you waiting for.
26 matches
Mail list logo
