Re: [Python-Dev] urllib bug in Python 3.2.1?

2011-07-31 Thread Ned Deily
In article <4e35dc94.2090...@mrabarnett.plus.com>, MRAB wrote: > Someone over at StackOverflow has a problem with urlopen in Python 3.2.1: > > > http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6892573/problem-with-urlopen/6892843#689284 > 3 > > This is the code: > > from urllib.request import urlope

[Python-Dev] urllib bug in Python 3.2.1?

2011-07-31 Thread MRAB
Someone over at StackOverflow has a problem with urlopen in Python 3.2.1: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/6892573/problem-with-urlopen/6892843#6892843 This is the code: from urllib.request import urlopen f = urlopen('http://online.wsj.com/mdc/public/page/2_3020-tips.html?mod=topnav

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fix closes Issue11281 - smtplib.STMP gets source_address parameter, which adds

2011-07-31 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 17:17:00 +0100 Michael Foord wrote: > > I found that [, timeout] bit odd too. But is not mentioning that as > > timeout=None when it is timeout=socket._GLOBAL_DEFAULT_TIME > > technically inaccurate? > > > > It does mean that users will expect to be able to call with an expli

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Fix closes Issue11281 - smtplib.STMP gets source_address parameter, which adds

2011-07-31 Thread Michael Foord
On 31 Jul 2011, at 02:26, Senthil Kumaran wrote: > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 11:11:08PM +0300, Ezio Melotti wrote: >>> -.. class:: SMTP(host='', port=0, local_hostname=None[, timeout]) >>> +.. class:: SMTP(host='', port=0, local_hostname=None[, timeout], >>> source_address=None) >> >> The "[, timeo

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython: Issue #11651: Improve Makefile test targets.

2011-07-31 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sun, 31 Jul 2011 18:26:42 +1000 Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 9:09 AM, nadeem.vawda > wrote: > > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b76684d62a8d > > changeset:   71645:b76684d62a8d > > user:        Nadeem Vawda > > date:        Sun Jul 31 01:09:04 2011 +0200 > > summary: > >  I

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython (2.7): note Ellipsis syntax

2011-07-31 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sat, 30 Jul 2011 23:47:36 -0700 Raymond Hettinger wrote: > > > > (Also, there must have been some reason to make "..." available everywhere > > for Python 3.) > > > > It's really nice for stub functions: > > def foo(x): > ... Using a docstring looks a lot less hackish (and it encourage

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #11651: Improve Makefile test targets.

2011-07-31 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jul 31, 2011, at 06:55 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote: >On Jul 31, 2011, at 06:26 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > >>That seems very questionable - the rationale for running the test >>suite twice by default to ensure PYC generation is working correctly >>still holds. > >Agreed. I'd at least like to have see

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #11651: Improve Makefile test targets.

2011-07-31 Thread Barry Warsaw
On Jul 31, 2011, at 06:26 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote: >That seems very questionable - the rationale for running the test >suite twice by default to ensure PYC generation is working correctly >still holds. Agreed. I'd at least like to have seen discussion on python-dev instead of just in the tracker.

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #11651: Improve Makefile test targets.

2011-07-31 Thread Nadeem Vawda
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 10:26 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 9:09 AM, nadeem.vawda > wrote: >> - Remove duplicate test run in "make test" and "make testuniversal" > > That seems very questionable - the rationale for running the test > suite twice by default to ensure PYC genera

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: Issue #11651: Improve Makefile test targets.

2011-07-31 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 9:09 AM, nadeem.vawda wrote: > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/b76684d62a8d > changeset:   71645:b76684d62a8d > user:        Nadeem Vawda > date:        Sun Jul 31 01:09:04 2011 +0200 > summary: >  Issue #11651: Improve Makefile test targets. > > - Use -j0 option by defau

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython (2.7): note Ellipsis syntax

2011-07-31 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 4:28 PM, Georg Brandl wrote: > (Also, there must have been some reason to make "..." available everywhere > for Python 3.) Not really - it just let us ditch some special casing in the compilation toolchain that *restricted* it to being used in subscripts (i.e. we were look