Hi,
the py3k debug build has been broken in Cython's integration tests for a
couple of weeks now due to a use-after-decref bug. Here's the fix, please
apply.
BTW, is there a reason unicode_subtype_new() copies the buffer of the
unicode object it just created, instead of just stealing it?
S
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:17 PM, Sam Partington
wrote:
> Ok ok, I give up. Apparently I am the only one who wants to be able
> to run different versions of python based on the shebang line AND add
> occasional arguments to the python command line.
As a simpler alternative, I suggest the launche
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 11:52 PM, eric.araujo
wrote:
> +To distribute extension modules that live in a package (e.g.
> ``package.ext``),
> +you need to create you need to create a :file:`{package}/__init__.py` file to
> +let Python recognize and import your module.
"you need to create" is repeat
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 1:57 AM, raymond.hettinger
wrote:
> + If *typed* is set to True, function arguments of different types will be
> + cached separately. For example, ``f(3)`` and ``f(3.0)`` will be treated
> + as distinct calls with distinct results.
I've been pondering this one a bit
Hello,
There are currently a bunch of various buildbot failures on all 3
branches. I would remind committers to regularly take a look at the
buildbots, so that these failures get solved reasonably fast.
Regards
Antoine.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
P
Le vendredi 29 juillet 2011 19:01:06, Guido van Rossum a écrit :
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > On Sat, Jul 30, 2011 at 1:17 AM, Antoine Pitrou
wrote:
> >> On Thu, 28 Jul 2011 11:28:43 +0200
> >>
> >> Victor Stinner wrote:
> >>> I will add your alternative to the PE
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 18:23:24 + (GMT)
Richard Saunders wrote:
>
> If both loops are the same unicode kind, we can add memcmp
> to unicode_compare for an optimization:
>
> Py_ssize_t len = (len1
> /* use memcmp if both the same kind */
> if (kind1==kind2) {
> int result=me
On 19 October 2011 13:17, Sam Partington wrote:
> Ok ok, I give up. Apparently I am the only one who wants to be able
> to run different versions of python based on the shebang line AND add
> occasional arguments to the python command line.
I don't know if this is of use to anyone, but I attach
Richard Saunders, 21.10.2011 20:23:
As long as the two strings are the same unicode "kind", you can use a
memcmp to compare. In that case, I would almost argue some memcmp
optimization is even more important: unicode strings are potentially 2
to 4 times larger, so the amount of time spent in memc
2011/10/21 Eric V. Smith :
> On 10/21/2011 12:31 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> 2011/10/21 Eric V. Smith :
>>> What's the logic for adding some braces, but removing others?
>>
>> No braces if everything is a one-liner, otherwise braces everywhere.
>
> Not sure what "everything" means here. My spec
>>> Richard Saunders>>> I have been doing some performance experiments with memcmp, and I was>>> surprised that memcmp wasn't faster than it was in Python. I did a whole,>>> long analysis and came up with some very simple results.Antoine Pitrou, 20.10.2011 23:08:>> Thanks for the analysis. Non-
2011/10/21 Tres Seaver :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/21/2011 12:31 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> 2011/10/21 Eric V. Smith :
>>> What's the logic for adding some braces, but removing others?
>>
>> No braces if everything is a one-liner, otherwise braces
>> everywher
2011/10/21 Tres Seaver :
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/21/2011 12:31 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>> 2011/10/21 Eric V. Smith :
>>> What's the logic for adding some braces, but removing others?
>>
>> No braces if everything is a one-liner, otherwise braces
>> everywher
Tres Seaver wrote:
On 10/21/2011 12:31 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
2011/10/21 Eric V. Smith :
>>>
What's the logic for adding some braces, but removing others?
>>
No braces if everything is a one-liner, otherwise braces
everywhere.
Hmm, PEP 7 doesn't show any example of the one-liner exce
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Oct 21, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
>Hmm, PEP 7 doesn't show any example of the one-liner exception. Given
>that it tends to promote errors, particularly among
>indentation-conditioned Python programmers (adding another statement
>at t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/21/2011 12:31 PM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2011/10/21 Eric V. Smith :
>> What's the logic for adding some braces, but removing others?
>
> No braces if everything is a one-liner, otherwise braces
> everywhere.
Hmm, PEP 7 doesn't show any exa
2011/10/21 Eric V. Smith :
> What's the logic for adding some braces, but removing others?
No braces if everything is a one-liner, otherwise braces everywhere.
--
Regards,
Benjamin
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.o
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-10-14 - 2011-10-21)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open3095 (+18)
closed 21927 (+43)
total 25022 (+61)
Open issues wit
On Fri, 21 Oct 2011 08:24:44 +0200
Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Antoine Pitrou, 20.10.2011 23:08:
> >> I have been doing some performance experiments with memcmp, and I was
> >> surprised that memcmp wasn't faster than it was in Python. I did a whole,
> >> long analysis and came up with some very simpl
What's the logic for adding some braces, but removing others?
On 10/19/2011 4:58 PM, benjamin.peterson wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/9c79a25f4a8b
> changeset: 73010:9c79a25f4a8b
> branch: 3.2
> parent: 72998:99a9f0251924
> user:Benjamin Peterson
> date:Wed
20 matches
Mail list logo
