On Thu, Nov 24, 2011 at 10:28 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Mea culpa for not keeping track, but what's the status of PEP 380? I
> really want this in Python 3.3!
There are two relevant tracker issues (both with me for the moment).
The main tracker issue for PEP 380 is here: http://bugs.python.o
Mea culpa for not keeping track, but what's the status of PEP 380? I
really want this in Python 3.3!
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscri
On Nov 22, 2011, at 12:43 PM, Amaury Forgeot d'Arc wrote:
> 2011/11/22 Philip Jenvey
> One reason to target 3.2 for now is it's not a moving target. There's
> overhead involved in managing modifications to the pure python standard lib
> needed for PyPy, tracking 3.3 changes as they happen as w
> In Python 3.2, PyUnicode_Resize() expects a number of Py_UNICODE units,
> whereas Python 3.3 expects a number of characters.
Is that really the case? If the string is not ready (i.e. the kind is
WCHAR_KIND), then it does count Py_UNICODE units, no?
Callers are supposed to call PyUnicode_Resize
Dirkjan Ochtman writes:
> I'm sorry for the lack of response in the past. I looked at Gentoo's
> Bugzilla and didn't find any related bugs you reported or were CC'ed
> on, can you name some of them?
This isn't about my bugs; I've been able to work through them
satisfactorily. It's about what
On Nov 22, 2011, at 07:50 PM, Larry Hastings wrote:
>I've volunteered to be the Release Manager for Python 3.4. The FLUFL has
>already given it his Sloppy Wet Kiss Of Approval,
I think you mistook that for my slackjaw droolings when you repeatedly ignored
my warnings to run as far from it as pos
Ned Deily writes:
> In article <87fwhfqywr@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp>,
> "Stephen J. Turnbull" wrote:
> > I haven't had the nerve to do this on MacPorts because "port" is such
> > a flaky thing (not so much port itself, but so many ports assume that
> > the port maintainer's local config
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 13:21, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> > Problems like what?
>
> Like those I explained later in the post, which you cut. But I'll
They were in a later post, I didn't cut them. :)
> > Please create a connection to your distro by filing bugs as you
> > encounter them?
>
>
Dirkjan Ochtman writes:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 17:41, Stephen J. Turnbull
> wrote:
> > This is still a big mess in Gentoo and MacPorts, though. MacPorts
> > hasn't done anything about ceating a transition infrastructure AFAICT.
> > Gentoo has its "eselect python set VERSION" stuff, but i
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 17:41, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> This is still a big mess in Gentoo and MacPorts, though. MacPorts
> hasn't done anything about ceating a transition infrastructure AFAICT.
> Gentoo has its "eselect python set VERSION" stuff, but it's very
> dangerous to set to a Python
Le Mercredi 23 Novembre 2011 01:49:28 Terry Reedy a écrit :
> The one-liner could be followed by
>assert(kind==1 || kind==2 || kind==4)
> which would also serve to remind the reader of the possibilities.
For a ready string, kind must be 1, 2 or 4. We might rename "kind" to
"charsize" because
Antoine Pitrou writes:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:27:24 -0800
> Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > >
> > > But look! I'm already practicing: NO YOU CAN'T CHECK THAT IN. How's
> > > that? Needs work?
> >
> > You could try a more positive leadership style: THAT LOOKS GREAT, I'M
> > SURE THE
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 6:50 AM, Senthil Kumaran wrote:
> That's cool. But just my thought, wouldn't it be better for someone
> who regularly commits, fixes bugs and feature requests be better for a
> RM role? Once a developer gets bored with those and wants more, could
> take up RM role. Is ther
13 matches
Mail list logo
