On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 4:53 PM, Stefan Behnel stefan...@behnel.de wrote:
If these changes are considered acceptable, I'll copy the above over to the
documentation bug I opened at
http://bugs.python.org/issue11379
Can these doc changes go into both 2.7 and 3.3? Given that there is no
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Do you know simple task to start contributing to Python? Something
useful and not boring if possible :-) There is the easy tag on the bug
tracker, but many issues have a long history, already have a patch, etc.
Do know other generic task
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 11:00, Stefan Krah ste...@bytereef.org wrote:
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@haypocalc.com wrote:
Do you know simple task to start contributing to Python? Something
useful and not boring if possible :-) There is the easy tag on the bug
tracker, but many issues have a
On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 10:17, Eli Bendersky eli...@gmail.com wrote:
Do we have buildbots that build Python with Clang instead of GCC? The reason
I'm asking is that Clang's diagnostics are usually better, and fixing all
its warnings could nicely complement fixing GCC's qualms.
The box running
Greg Ewing wrote:
Mark Shannon wrote:
I have a new dict implementation which allows sharing of keys between
objects of the same class.
We already have the __slots__ mechanism for memory savings.
Have you done any comparisons with that?
You can't make Python programmers use slots, neither
Stefan Behnel, 14.12.2011 20:41:
It's clear from the
discussion that there are still users and that new code is still being
written that uses MiniDOM. However, I would argue that this cannot possibly
be performance critical code and that it only deals with somewhat small
documents. I say that
Le 16/12/2011 07:53, Stefan Behnel a écrit :
Additionally, the documentation on the xml.sax page would benefit from
the following paragraph:
[[Note: The xml.sax package provides an implementation of the SAX
interface whose API is similar to that in other programming languages.
Users who
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2011-12-09 - 2011-12-16)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open3175 ( +6)
closed 0 (+40)
total 25395 (+46)
Open issues
Greg Ewing wrote:
Mark Shannon wrote:
I have a new dict implementation which allows sharing of keys between
objects of the same class.
We already have the __slots__ mechanism for memory savings.
Have you done any comparisons with that?
You can't make Python programmers use slots, neither
On 12/16/2011 5:03 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
Of course using __slots__ saves more memory,
but people don't use them much.
Do you think the stdlib should be using __slots__ more?
--
Terry Jan Reedy
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Jim Jewett wrote:
Greg Ewing wrote:
Mark Shannon wrote:
I have a new dict implementation which allows sharing of keys between
objects of the same class.
We already have the __slots__ mechanism for memory savings.
Have you done any comparisons with that?
You can't make Python
Terry Reedy wrote:
On 12/16/2011 5:03 AM, Mark Shannon wrote:
Of course using __slots__ saves more memory,
but people don't use them much.
Do you think the stdlib should be using __slots__ more?
For some things yes, but where it's critical slots are already used.
Take the ordered dict, the
12 matches
Mail list logo
