On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:49 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
>
> On 22 Dec 2011, at 01:25, Mark Hammond wrote:
>
> > FWIW, the most recent version of pywin32 has the following download
> counts (rounded to the nearest thousand)
> >
> > Version 32bit 64bit
> > -
> > 3.2 - 75
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 02:49:06AM +0100, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> >Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
> >everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
>
> At work, we are still using Python 2.5. Six months ago, we started a
> project to upgrade to 2.7, but we have now more urgent ta
I'm paid to write Python3. I've also been writing Python3 for hobby
projects since mid 2010. I'm on the verge of going back to 2.7 due to
compatibility issues :(
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Mike Meyer wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:49:37 +
> Michael Foord wrote:
>> These figures can't
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 01:49:37 +
Michael Foord wrote:
> These figures can't possibly be true. No-one is using Python 3 yet. ;-)
Since you brought it up. Is anyone paying people (or trying to hire
people) to write Python 3?
Thanks,
http://www.mired.org/
Independent
2011/12/21 Gregory P. Smith :
> I have some features I need to add to lib2to3 to make it more useful for our
> purposes at work supporting our massive code base in a Python 2 to 3
> transition. Which tree should I develop these and check these into?
>
> cpython/default?
>
> Can I backport this to 3
On 21/12/2011 15:26, anatoly techtonik wrote:
I believe most AppEngine applications in Python are still using 2.5
run-time. So are development boxes for these applications. It may take
another year or two for the transition.
App engine 1.6 improved support of Python 2.7, so I hope that -slowly-
What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
There is no such consensus :-)
Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
At work, we are still using Python 2.5. Six months ago, we started a
project to upgrade to 2.7, but we
On 22 Dec 2011, at 01:25, Mark Hammond wrote:
> FWIW, the most recent version of pywin32 has the following download counts
> (rounded to the nearest thousand)
>
> Version 32bit 64bit
> -
> 3.2 - 75,000 9,000
> 3.1 - 4,000 1,000
> 2.7 - 126,000 1
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 21:32:44 +
> Mark Shannon wrote:
> >
> > > per-instance attributes, it just forces them all to keep resizing up,
> > > even though individual instances would be small with the current dict.
> > There is a cut-off po
I have some features I need to add to lib2to3 to make it more useful for
our purposes at work supporting our massive code base in a Python 2 to 3
transition. Which tree should I develop these and check these into?
cpython/default?
Can I backport this to 3.2 and 2.7? It counts as a feature additi
FWIW, the most recent version of pywin32 has the following download
counts (rounded to the nearest thousand)
Version 32bit 64bit
-
3.2 - 75,000 9,000
3.1 - 4,000 1,000
2.7 - 126,000 16,000
2.6 - 46,000 6,000
2.5 - 21,000 n/a
2.4 -
On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 10:42 +0100, Charles-François Natali wrote:
> > Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
> > everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
>
> RHEL 5.7 ships with Python 2.4.3. So no, not everybody is on 2.6+
> today, and this won't happen before a couple years.
(and R
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Leo Jay wrote:
> It seems that the situation described here is similar:
> http://bugs.python.org/issue10128
>
> But the patch doesn't work for me.
>
> Anybody knows how to fix this?
Try the patch from http://bugs.python.org/issue10845 (the one on
#10128 only parti
I believe most AppEngine applications in Python are still using 2.5
run-time. So are development boxes for these applications. It may take
another year or two for the transition.
--
anatoly t.
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> What's the python-dev view on this?
>
> -
Michael Foord wrote:
> On 21 Dec 2011, at 12:42, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> >
> > FWIW, Ubuntu dropped 2.5 quite a while ago. The next LTS (long term
> > support) release in April 2012 will have only Python 2.7 (and 3.2).
True, but 2.5 is still current on Hardy, an LTS release that is officially
su
I am still working on projects based on Python2.4 in commercial
environments (limitation of OS: Solaris 5.10). And I don't think this will
be changed soon..
2011/12/21 Michael Foord
>
> On 21 Dec 2011, at 12:42, Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> > On Dec 21, 2011, at 07:16 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
> >
>
On Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:16:06 +
Chris Withers wrote:
> What's the python-dev view on this?
Python 2.5 is not supported by *us* anymore (*). Anyone still using it
therefore relies on their OS vendor to apply potential security
patches and other important fixes.
Library authors can of course ch
On 21 Dec 2011, at 12:42, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Dec 21, 2011, at 07:16 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>
>> What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
>
> FWIW, Ubuntu dropped 2.5 quite a while ago. The next LTS (long term support)
> release in April 2012 will have only Python
On Dec 21, 2011, at 07:16 AM, Chris Withers wrote:
>What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
FWIW, Ubuntu dropped 2.5 quite a while ago. The next LTS (long term support)
release in April 2012 will have only Python 2.7 (and 3.2). The currently
in-development next Debian re
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 07:16:06AM +, Chris Withers wrote:
> What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
>
> Do people still have to use this in commercial environments
I have to use it. There is a rather large and complex intranet site
with both 32- and 64-bit versions
> Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
> everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
RHEL 5.7 ships with Python 2.4.3. So no, not everybody is on 2.6+
today, and this won't happen before a couple years.
cf
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 08:16, Chris Withers wrote:
> What's the general consensus on supporting Python 2.5 nowadays?
>
> Do people still have to use this in commercial environments or is
> everyone on 2.6+ nowadays?
This seems rather off-topic for python-dev.
FWIW, on Gentoo we're just now gett
Hi All,
I posted this several days ago in python mailing list but got no response
and I think it might be a bug, so I post it here. Apologize if it's
not appropriate.
I have a file p.zip, there is a __main__.py in it, and the content of
__main__.py is:
from multiprocessing import Process
import
What's the python-dev view on this?
Original Message
Subject: Anyone still using Python 2.5?
Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 07:15:46 +
From: Chris Withers
To: Python List ,
"testing-in-pyt...@lists.idyll.org" ,
simplis...@googlegroups.com
Hi All,
What's the general consensus o
24 matches
Mail list logo
