Re: [Python-Dev] compiling cpython in visual studio 2010

2012-02-18 Thread Terry Reedy
On 2/18/2012 11:54 PM, Ejaj Hassan wrote: Hello everyone, I am trying to work on Python bugs following the tutorial given in the python website. I have installed Tortoise svn and visual studio 2010, I cloned a copy of cpython as it is advised in the website using, however I am having some problem

[Python-Dev] compiling cpython in visual studio 2010

2012-02-18 Thread Ejaj Hassan
Hello everyone, I am trying to work on Python bugs following the tutorial given in the python website. I have installed Tortoise svn and visual studio 2010, I cloned a copy of cpython as it is advised in the website using, however I am having some problem in compiling it using visual studio 2010. I

Re: [Python-Dev] Status of PEP 397 - Python launcher for Windows

2012-02-18 Thread Glenn Linderman
On 2/17/2012 9:24 PM, Mark Hammond wrote: I've been using the implementation for a number of months now and I find it incredibly useful. +1 ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscri

Re: [Python-Dev] Status of PEP 397 - Python launcher for Windows

2012-02-18 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sun, Feb 19, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Mark Hammond wrote: > The launcher was slightly controversial when the pep was initially written > 12 months ago.  If you believe the creation of the PEP was procedurally > incorrect I'm happy to withdraw it - obviously I just want the launcher, > with or without a

Re: [Python-Dev] Status of PEP 397 - Python launcher for Windows

2012-02-18 Thread Mark Hammond
On 18/02/2012 11:08 PM, mar...@v.loewis.de wrote: Zitat von Mark Hammond : I'm wondering what thoughts are on PEP 397, the Python launcher for Windows. I've been using the implementation for a number of months now and I find it incredibly useful. I wonder what the rationale for the PEP (as o

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review

2012-02-18 Thread Ben Finney
Greg Ewing writes: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > if there is an *actual* causal link between file A and B, the > > difference in timestamps should always be much larger than 100 ns. > > And if there isn't a causal link, simultaneity is relative anyway. To > Fred sitting at his computer, file A m

Re: [Python-Dev] PEP 410 (Decimal timestamp): the implementation is ready for a review

2012-02-18 Thread Greg Ewing
Guido van Rossum wrote: if there is an *actual* causal link between file A and B, the difference in timestamps should always be much larger than 100 ns. And if there isn't a causal link, simultaneity is relative anyway. To Fred sitting at his computer, file A might have been created before file

Re: [Python-Dev] problem after installing python 3.2.2

2012-02-18 Thread Sandro Tosi
Hello Vahid, i'm sorry but this mailing list is not the right place where to ask such question, I suggest get in touch with http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list for support. On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 18:15, Vahid Ghaderi wrote: > i have downloaded and installed python 3.2.2 but still

[Python-Dev] problem after installing python 3.2.2

2012-02-18 Thread Vahid Ghaderi
hi i have downloaded and installed python 3.2.2 but still when i use python in terminal it show's: root@debian:~# python Python 2.6.6 (r266:84292, Dec 27 2010, 00:02:40) [GCC 4.4.5] on linux2 Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information. how can i change the default to p

Re: [Python-Dev] Status of PEP 397 - Python launcher for Windows

2012-02-18 Thread martin
Zitat von Mark Hammond : I'm wondering what thoughts are on PEP 397, the Python launcher for Windows. I've been using the implementation for a number of months now and I find it incredibly useful. I wonder what the rationale for the PEP (as opposed to the rationale for the launcher) is -