On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 02:49:41 -0400
Jim Jewett jimjjew...@gmail.com wrote:
Accuracy:
Is the answer correct? Any clock will eventually drift; if a
clock is intended to match Civil Time, it will need to be adjusted
back to the true time.
You may also point to
Hello,
I'm just starting a new thread since the old ones are so crowded.
First, overall I think the PEP is starting to look really good and
insightful! (congratulations to Victor)
I have a couple of comments, mostly small ones:
function (str): name of the underlying operating system function.
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2012-04-06 - 2012-04-13)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open3377 (+17)
closed 22971 (+36)
total 26348 (+53)
Open issues
The descriptions should really stress the scope of the result's
validity. My guess (or wish :-)) would be:
- time.monotonic(): system-wide results, comparable from one process to
another
- time.perf_counter(): process-wide results, comparable from one thread
to another (?)
-
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 11:29, Victor Stinner
I will move the precision of monotonic clock of Windows 9x info into this
table.
I would just remove it entirely. It's not relevant since it's not supported.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Are there any good small Python libraries for making HTML safe out there?
http://goo.gl/D6ag1
Just to make sure that devs are aware of the problem, which was
reported more than 6 months ago, gain some traction and release fix
sooner. I am not sure what can you do with a stolen bugs.python.org
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 9:23 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any good small Python libraries for making HTML safe out there?
http://goo.gl/D6ag1
Just to make sure that devs are aware of the problem, which was
reported more than 6 months ago, gain some traction and
bugs.python.org already sanitizes the ok_message and Ezio already posted
a patch to the upstream bug tracker, so I don’t see what else we could do.
Also note that the Firefox extension NoScript blocks the XSS in this case.
Regards
___
Python-Dev
On Fri, 13 Apr 2012 18:29:10 +0200
Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
The descriptions should really stress the scope of the result's
validity. My guess (or wish :-)) would be:
- time.monotonic(): system-wide results, comparable from one process to
another
-
By the way, I hesitate to add a new mandatory key to
time.get_clock_info() which indicates if the clock includes time
elapsed during a sleep. Is is_realtime a good name for such flag?
Examples:
time.get_clock_info('time')['is_realtime'] == True
time.get_clock_info('monotonic')['is_realtime'] ==
For those of you who had noticed that since the upgrade the tracker
search hasn't been returning a complete set of hits on typical searches,
this should now be fixed.
--David
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
Hi,
Before posting a first draft of the PEP 418 to python-dev, I have some
questions.
== Naming: time.monotonic() or time.steady()? ==
I like the steady name but different people complained that the
steady name should not be used if the function falls back to the
system clock or if the clock is
Executive summary:
On naming, how about CLOCK_METRONOMIC? Also, is_adjusted is
better, until the API is expanded to provide when and how much
information about past adjustments.
On the glossary, (1) precision, accuracy, and resolution mean
different things for points in time and for durations;
13 matches
Mail list logo
