Re: [Python-Dev] No summary of tracker issues this week?

2012-08-05 Thread R. David Murray
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:39:22 +0100, MRAB wrote: > On 05/08/2012 23:31, Mark Lawrence wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > I keep an eye open for this but can't find one for Saturday 03/08/2012. > >Have I missed it, has it been stopped, has something gone wrong with > > its production or what? > > > I ha

[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues

2012-08-05 Thread Python tracker
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2012-07-30 - 2012-08-06) Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue. Do NOT respond to this message. Issues counts and deltas: open3559 (+18) closed 23781 (+51) total 27340 (+69) Open issues wit

Re: [Python-Dev] No summary of tracker issues this week?

2012-08-05 Thread MRAB
On 05/08/2012 23:31, Mark Lawrence wrote: Hi all, I keep an eye open for this but can't find one for Saturday 03/08/2012. Have I missed it, has it been stopped, has something gone wrong with its production or what? I haven't seen it either. ___ Py

[Python-Dev] No summary of tracker issues this week?

2012-08-05 Thread Mark Lawrence
Hi all, I keep an eye open for this but can't find one for Saturday 03/08/2012. Have I missed it, has it been stopped, has something gone wrong with its production or what? -- Cheers. Mark Lawrence. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.o

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython (merge 3.2 -> default): Make TextIOWrapper's documentation clearer by copying the newline argument's

2012-08-05 Thread Chris Jerdonek
On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > 2012/8/4 Chris Jerdonek : >> Now that this change is made, it may make sense to update the >> subprocess documentation to reference TextIOWrapper's documentation >> instead of open()'s (since use of the 'U' flag to open() is >> discouraged i

Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] devguide: It has been pointed out this paragraph was incorrect. One of the Windows devs

2012-08-05 Thread Chris Jerdonek
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 1:48 AM, nick.coghlan wrote: > http://hg.python.org/devguide/rev/f518f23d06d5 > changeset: 539:f518f23d06d5 > summary: > It has been pointed out this paragraph was incorrect. One of the Windows > devs will need to fill in more accurate info > diff --git a/setup.rst b/se

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython: Close #15559: Implementing __index__ creates a nasty interaction with the bytes

2012-08-05 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Sun, Aug 5, 2012 at 11:00 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 10:20:36 +0200 (CEST) > nick.coghlan wrote: > >> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5abea8a43f19 >> changeset: 78426:5abea8a43f19 >> user:Nick Coghlan >> date:Sun Aug 05 18:20:17 2012 +1000 >> summary: >

Re: [Python-Dev] cpython: Close #15559: Implementing __index__ creates a nasty interaction with the bytes

2012-08-05 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Sun, 5 Aug 2012 10:20:36 +0200 (CEST) nick.coghlan wrote: > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/5abea8a43f19 > changeset: 78426:5abea8a43f19 > user:Nick Coghlan > date:Sun Aug 05 18:20:17 2012 +1000 > summary: > Close #15559: Implementing __index__ creates a nasty interactio

Re: [Python-Dev] Understanding the buffer API

2012-08-05 Thread Jeff Allen
- Summary: The PEP, or sometimes just the documentation, definitely requires that features not requested shall be NULL. The API would benefit from: a. stored flags that tell you the actual structural features. b. requiring exporters to provide full information (e.g. strides = {1}, fo