Re: [Python-Dev] Edits to Metadata 1.2 to add extras (optional dependencies)

2012-08-27 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 6:29 AM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Am 27.08.12 16:56, schrieb Daniel Holth: >> Metadata 1.2 is nearly 8 years old and it's Accepted but not Final. Is >> it better to continue editing it, or create a new PEP for Metadata >> 1.3? > > > You can't add new fields to the format

Re: [Python-Dev] question re: default branch and release clone

2012-08-27 Thread Georg Brandl
On 28.08.2012 06:22, Petri Lehtinen wrote: Georg Brandl wrote: Changes to the default branch must be bugfix-only. The 3.4 development only opens when the 3.3 branch is created, which happens after the release of 3.3.0 final. Changes made in default and not cherry-picked to the 3.3.0 release cl

Re: [Python-Dev] Edits to Metadata 1.2 to add extras (optional dependencies)

2012-08-27 Thread Stephen J. Turnbull
Petri Lehtinen writes: > Daniel Holth wrote: > > I don't know of a tool that doesn't reliably ignore extra fields, but > > I will put you down as being in favor of an X- fields paragraph: > > > > Extensions (X- Fields) > > :: > > > > Metadata files can contain fields t

Re: [Python-Dev] question re: default branch and release clone

2012-08-27 Thread Petri Lehtinen
Georg Brandl wrote: > Changes to the default branch must be bugfix-only. The 3.4 development > only opens when the 3.3 branch is created, which happens after the > release of 3.3.0 final. > > Changes made in default and not cherry-picked to the 3.3.0 release clone > will therefore end up in 3.3.1

Re: [Python-Dev] Edits to Metadata 1.2 to add extras (optional dependencies)

2012-08-27 Thread Petri Lehtinen
Daniel Holth wrote: > I don't know of a tool that doesn't reliably ignore extra fields, but > I will put you down as being in favor of an X- fields paragraph: > > Extensions (X- Fields) > :: > > Metadata files can contain fields that are not part of > the specification, called

Re: [Python-Dev] Edits to Metadata 1.2 to add extras (optional dependencies)

2012-08-27 Thread Daniel Holth
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 4:29 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Am 27.08.12 16:56, schrieb Daniel Holth: > >> On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Holth wrote: >>> >>> I've drafted some edits to Metadata 1.2 with valuable feedback from >> >> ... >>> >>> (full changeset on >>> https://bitbucket.or

Re: [Python-Dev] Edits to Metadata 1.2 to add extras (optional dependencies)

2012-08-27 Thread Martin v. Löwis
Am 27.08.12 16:56, schrieb Daniel Holth: On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Holth wrote: I've drafted some edits to Metadata 1.2 with valuable feedback from ... (full changeset on https://bitbucket.org/dholth/python-peps/changeset/537e83bd4068) Metadata 1.2 is nearly 8 years old and

Re: [Python-Dev] Edits to Metadata 1.2 to add extras (optional dependencies)

2012-08-27 Thread Daniel Holth
On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Daniel Holth wrote: > I've drafted some edits to Metadata 1.2 with valuable feedback from ... > (full changeset on > https://bitbucket.org/dholth/python-peps/changeset/537e83bd4068) Metadata 1.2 is nearly 8 years old and it's Accepted but not Final. Is it better