On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 2:22 AM, Chris Jerdonek
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:00 PM, ezio.melotti
> wrote:
>> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/76dd082d332e
>> changeset: 79022:76dd082d332e
>> branch: 2.7
>> parent: 79014:8f847f66a49f
>> user:Ezio Melotti
>> date:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:00 PM, ezio.melotti
wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/76dd082d332e
> changeset: 79022:76dd082d332e
> branch: 2.7
> parent: 79014:8f847f66a49f
> user:Ezio Melotti
> date:Fri Sep 14 01:58:33 2012 +0300
> summary:
> #15437, #15439: merg
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:14:17 +1000
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:43 AM, R. David Murray
>> wrote:
>> > When the removal was being pondered, the possibility of keeping certain
>> > bits that were more ready than others
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Éric Araujo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 13/09/2012 10:34, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
>> Actually, I'd be happy to do the rearrangement needed to turn pkgutil
>> into a package rather than the current single module.
>
> I very much prefer not mixing pkgutil (dealing with packa
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:39 AM, Éric Araujo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Le 13/09/2012 10:34, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
>> Actually, I'd be happy to do the rearrangement needed to turn pkgutil
>> into a package rather than the current single module.
>
> I very much prefer not mixing pkgutil (dealing with packa
Hi,
Le 13/09/2012 10:34, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
> Actually, I'd be happy to do the rearrangement needed to turn pkgutil
> into a package rather than the current single module.
I very much prefer not mixing pkgutil (dealing with packages that you
import) and build/distribution/installation support
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 12:34 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Anyway, the essential idea of getting those 4 modules (and support
> libraries) that almost made it into 3.3 into sufficiently good shape
> that they can be distributed independently of distutils2 and adopted
> as a dependency by multiple pro
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Chris Jerdonek
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>> Here's my proposal - actually it's Nick's proposal but I want to make sure
>> we're on the same
>> page wrt steps, and I think that addresses Antoine concerns
>>
>> 1. create a new pack
In the process of studying the global state of our doctests, I noticed
that the doctests in Doc/library/ctypes.rst use the following doctest
directives:
# doctest: +LINUX
# doctest: +WINDOWS
However, I'm not able to find evidence that these directives are
implemented anywhere. Thus I get an erro
On 9/13/12 2:45 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
4. ask each project to pour in pkglib anything that can be reused by others
+1, although again it'll be down to the projects whether they do
actually contribute. Also this somewhat contradicts the "be strict"
point above, which is why I'm lukewarm on "be str
On 13 September 2012 12:32, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> Here's my proposal - actually it's Nick's proposal but I want to make sure
> we're on the same
> page wrt steps, and I think that addresses Antoine concerns
>
> 1. create a new package, called pkglib (or whatever), located at hg
> .python.org as a n
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 7:32 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
>
> Yeah but we've been too ambitious.
>
> Here's my proposal - actually it's Nick's proposal but I want to make
> sure we're on the same
> page wrt steps, and I think that addresses Antoine concerns
>
> 1. create a new package,
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:32 AM, Tarek Ziadé wrote:
> Here's my proposal - actually it's Nick's proposal but I want to make sure
> we're on the same
> page wrt steps, and I think that addresses Antoine concerns
>
> 1. create a new package, called pkglib (or whatever), located at hg
> .python.org a
On 9/13/12 11:38 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:14:17 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:43 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
When the removal was being pondered, the possibility of keeping certain
bits that were more ready than others was discussed. Perhaps the b
On Thursday, September 13, 2012 at 5:38 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> Most people use distutils / packaging as
> an application, not a library. If you provide only a subset of
> the necessary features, people won't use packaging.
Not that I think current usage patterns matter since moving from setup
On Thu, 13 Sep 2012 11:14:17 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 8:43 AM, R. David Murray
> wrote:
> > When the removal was being pondered, the possibility of keeping certain
> > bits that were more ready than others was discussed. Perhaps the best
> > way forward is to put it b
16 matches
Mail list logo
