On 9/29/2012 2:38 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
Does this mean we want to re-open the discussion about decimal constants?
Last time this came up I think we decided that we wanted to wait for
cdecimal (which is obviously here) and work out how to handle contexts, the
syntax, etc.
I think that oug
On 9/29/2012 11:48 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 30/09/12 10:43, Jan Kaliszewski wrote:
Hello,
In http://docs.python.org/release/3.2.3/reference/expressions.html#in we
read: "[...] This can create the illusion of non-transitivity between
supported cross-type comparisons and unsupported comparis
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:09 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:01:00 +1000, Tim Delaney
> wrote:
>> Also the example at
>> http://docs.python.org/py3k/whatsnew/3.3.html#pep-409-suppressing-exception-contextreads:
>>
>> ... raise AttributeError(attr) from None...
>>
On Sun, 30 Sep 2012 08:01:00 +1000, Tim Delaney
wrote:
> Also the example at
> http://docs.python.org/py3k/whatsnew/3.3.html#pep-409-suppressing-exception-contextreads:
>
> ... raise AttributeError(attr) from None...
>
> Looks like there's an elipsis there that shouldn't be.
This a
On 30/09/12 10:43, Jan Kaliszewski wrote:
Hello,
In http://docs.python.org/release/3.2.3/reference/expressions.html#in we
read: "[...] This can create the illusion of non-transitivity between
supported cross-type comparisons and unsupported comparisons. For example,
Decimal(2) == 2 and 2 == floa
On 2012-09-30 01:43, Jan Kaliszewski wrote:
Hello,
In http://docs.python.org/release/3.2.3/reference/expressions.html#in
we read: "[...] This can create the illusion of non-transitivity between
supported cross-type comparisons and unsupported comparisons. For
example, Decimal(2) == 2 and 2 == fl
Hello,
In http://docs.python.org/release/3.2.3/reference/expressions.html#in
we read: "[...] This can create the illusion of non-transitivity between
supported cross-type comparisons and unsupported comparisons. For
example, Decimal(2) == 2 and 2 == float(2) but Decimal(2) != float(2)."
(The
On Sep 29, 2012 2:38 PM, "Guido van Rossum" wrote:
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> >>
> >> On 29 September 2012 10:17, Stefan Krah wrote:
> >> > Tim Delaney wrote:
> >> >> If those numbers are similar in
In article
,
Tim Delaney wrote:
> BTW, "What's New": http://www.python.org/download/releases/3.3.0/ still
> says 80x for decimal performance.
Thanks for the report. The page has now been updated to match the final
3.3.0 release announcement post.
--
Ned Deily,
n...@acm.org
__
Also the example at
http://docs.python.org/py3k/whatsnew/3.3.html#pep-409-suppressing-exception-contextreads:
... raise AttributeError(attr) from None...
Looks like there's an elipsis there that shouldn't be.
Tim Delaney
___
Python-Dev mail
BTW, "What's New": http://www.python.org/download/releases/3.3.0/ still
says 80x for decimal performance.
Tim Delaney
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.or
-cc: python-dev
+cc: python-ideas
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > Does this mean we want to re-open the discussion about decimal constants?
> > Last time this came up I think we decided that we wanted to wait for
It's on my list of things to look at. I have a project due next week, then I'll
have some time.
--
Eric.
On Sep 29, 2012, at 2:11 PM, Ben Wolfson wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Benjamin Peterson
> wrote:
>> 2012/9/28 Ben Wolfson :
>>> There's a patch for this bug: http://bugs.pyt
On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 4:26 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Does this mean we want to re-open the discussion about decimal constants?
> Last time this came up I think we decided that we wanted to wait for
> cdecimal (which is obviously here) and work out how to handle contexts, the
> syntax, etc.
Just
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
>>
>> On 29 September 2012 10:17, Stefan Krah wrote:
>> > Tim Delaney wrote:
>> >> If those numbers are similar in other benchmarks, would it be accurate
>> >> and/or
>> >> reasonable
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 10:46:37 -0700, Glenn Linderman
wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> >> In total, almost 500 API items are new or improved in Python 3.3.
> >> For a more extensive list of changes in 3.3.0, see
> >>
> >> http://docs.python.org/3.3/whatsnew/3.3
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 29 September 2012 10:17, Stefan Krah wrote:
> > Tim Delaney wrote:
> >> If those numbers are similar in other benchmarks, would it be accurate
> and/or
> >> reasonable to include a statement along the lines of:
> >>
> >> "comparable to flo
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2012/9/28 Ben Wolfson :
>> There's a patch for this bug: http://bugs.python.org/issue12014 that
>> needs reviewed. Petri Lehtinen made some (very minor) comments back in
>> May; otherwise it's been neglected. I've brought this up occasio
2012/9/28 Ben Wolfson :
> There's a patch for this bug: http://bugs.python.org/issue12014 that
> needs reviewed. Petri Lehtinen made some (very minor) comments back in
> May; otherwise it's been neglected. I've brought this up occasionally
> here in the past; it would be great if someone could just
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
In total, almost 500 API items are new or improved in Python 3.3.
For a more extensive list of changes in 3.3.0, see
http://docs.python.org/3.3/whatsnew/3.3.html
Reading this to see if I missed anything while downloading the new releas
Hello,
I've created a 3.3 category on the buildbots:
http://buildbot.python.org/3.3/
http://buildbot.python.org/3.3.stable/
Someone will have to update the following HTML page:
http://python.org/dev/buildbot/
Regards
Antoine.
On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 14:18:54 +0200
Georg Brandl wrote:
> On beha
> Agreed - this is a really nice release, thanks to all who put it together.
+1
Thank you!
Malcolm
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/
On 09/29/2012 08:23 AM, Amit Saha wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>>
>>
>> For a more extensive list of changes in 3.3.0, see
>>
>> http://docs.python.org/3.3/whatsnew/3.3.html
> Redirects to http://docs.python.org/py3k/whatsnew/3.3.html: 404 Not Found.
>
>
Wor
Congrats Georg and team! I am incredibly proud of you all for
producing such a great release. As the marketeers would say, "Python
3.3 is the best Python ever!" The feature list is amazing.
--Guido
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> On behalf of the Python development team, I
On 29 September 2012 14:24, Eli Bendersky wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>> On behalf of the Python development team, I'm delighted to announce the
>> Python 3.3.0 final release.
>>
>
> Yay :)
Agreed - this is a really nice release, thanks to all who put it togethe
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 5:18 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> On behalf of the Python development team, I'm delighted to announce the
> Python 3.3.0 final release.
>
Yay :)
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listin
On 29 September 2012 10:17, Stefan Krah wrote:
> Tim Delaney wrote:
>> If those numbers are similar in other benchmarks, would it be accurate and/or
>> reasonable to include a statement along the lines of:
>>
>> "comparable to float performance - usually no more than 3x for calculations
>> within
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Dave Angel wrote:
> On 09/29/2012 08:23 AM, Amit Saha wrote:
>> On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> For a more extensive list of changes in 3.3.0, see
>>>
>>> http://docs.python.org/3.3/whatsnew/3.3.html
>> Redirects to http://
On Sat, Sep 29, 2012 at 10:18 PM, Georg Brandl wrote:
> On behalf of the Python development team, I'm delighted to announce the
> Python 3.3.0 final release.
>
> Python 3.3 includes a range of improvements of the 3.x series, as well
> as easier porting between 2.x and 3.x. Major new features and
On behalf of the Python development team, I'm delighted to announce the
Python 3.3.0 final release.
Python 3.3 includes a range of improvements of the 3.x series, as well
as easier porting between 2.x and 3.x. Major new features and changes
in the 3.3 release series are:
* PEP 380, syntax for d
Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > Wow! I had no idea cdecimal was that close in speed to float. That's
> > seriously impressive.
>
> I think this means the performance difference is on the same order
> of magnitude as the CPython interpretation overhead. Still, it's
> impressive indeed.
Of course, if yo
Tim Delaney wrote:
> If those numbers are similar in other benchmarks, would it be accurate and/or
> reasonable to include a statement along the lines of:
>
> "comparable to float performance - usually no more than 3x for calculations
> within the range of numbers covered by float"
For numerical
32 matches
Mail list logo
