On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Éric Araujo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Le 12/10/2012 13:50, Petri Lehtinen a écrit :
>> It's two and a half weeks left, but I've not seen any announcements
>> yet!
> Indeed, work and other commitments took over, so we (Montréal-Python)
> decided to move the bug day instea
Le 23/10/2012 21:52, R. David Murray a écrit :
> This is very disappointing. You had previously said that it was a go.
> People (who may or may not have spoken up here) may have already
> arranged space and be planning on it, despite the lack of announcement.
> I certainly was planning on it.
Oka
On Tue, 23 Oct 2012 21:19:29 -0400, wrote:
> Le 12/10/2012 13:50, Petri Lehtinen a écrit :
> > It's two and a half weeks left, but I've not seen any announcements
> > yet!
> Indeed, work and other commitments took over, so we (Montréal-Python)
> decided to move the bug day instead of announcing
Hello,
Le 12/10/2012 13:50, Petri Lehtinen a écrit :
> It's two and a half weeks left, but I've not seen any announcements
> yet!
Indeed, work and other commitments took over, so we (Montréal-Python)
decided to move the bug day instead of announcing it late. The date
that would work for us is Nov
On 10/23/2012 10:22 AM, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2012/10/22 Victor Stinner :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I forked CPython repository to work on my "split unicodeobject.c" project:
>> http://hg.python.org/sandbox/split-unicodeobject.c
>>
>> The result is 10 files (included the existing unicodeobject.c):
>>
>>
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 3:04 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
> On 22 October 2012 21:35, Daniel Holth wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Daniel Holth wrote:
>>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Hello,
The FAQ has this weird statement:
“This spec
2012/10/23 Antoine Pitrou :
> I agree with Marc-André, there's no point in compiling those files
> separately. #include'ing them in the master unicodeobject.c file is fine.
I also find the unicodeobject.c difficult to navigate.
Even if we don't split the file, I'd advocate a better presentation of
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:42 AM, wrote:
> I'm also -1 on the notion that the entire key distribution matter is out
> of scope. With that approach, I feel that the package signing is essentially
> pointless.
>
> As a general note on this, this entire issue lacks a threat model:
> what kind of att
Le 23/10/2012 12:05, Victor Stinner a écrit :
Such a restructuring should not result in compilers
no longer being able to optimize code by inlining functions
in one of the most important basic types we have in Python 3.
I agree that performances are important. But I'm not convinced than
moving
> Such a restructuring should not result in compilers
> no longer being able to optimize code by inlining functions
> in one of the most important basic types we have in Python 3.
I agree that performances are important. But I'm not convinced than
moving functions has a real impact on performances
On 23.10.2012 10:22, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> 2012/10/22 Victor Stinner :
>> Hi,
>>
>> I forked CPython repository to work on my "split unicodeobject.c" project:
>> http://hg.python.org/sandbox/split-unicodeobject.c
>>
>> The result is 10 files (included the existing unicodeobject.c):
>>
>> 117
2012/10/22 Victor Stinner :
> Hi,
>
> I forked CPython repository to work on my "split unicodeobject.c" project:
> http://hg.python.org/sandbox/split-unicodeobject.c
>
> The result is 10 files (included the existing unicodeobject.c):
>
> 1176 Objects/unicodecharmap.c
> 1678 Objects/unicodecodec
On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 7:46 AM, wrote:
> That's exactly what I want: it (PEP 427) should use one of the algorithms
> that is built-in (into web signatures). Web signatures give a choice of
> three algorithms; yet Daniel proposes to deviate and use a non-builtin
> algorithm.
>
> None of the algor
On 22 October 2012 21:35, Daniel Holth wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:26 PM, Daniel Holth wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> The FAQ has this weird statement:
>>>
>>> “This specification does not have an opinion on how you should organize
14 matches
Mail list logo