On 25.10.2012 08:42, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> Why are any of these codecs here in unicodeobjectland in the first
>> place? Sure, they're needed so that Python can find its own stuff,
>> but in principle *any* codec could be needed. Is it just an heuristic
>> that the codecs needed for 99% of the wo
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Nick Coghlan writes:
>
> > OK, I need to weigh in after seeing this kind of reply. Large source files
> > are discouraged in general because they're a code smell that points
> > strongly towards a *lack of modularity* within a *compl
Nick Coghlan writes:
> OK, I need to weigh in after seeing this kind of reply. Large source files
> are discouraged in general because they're a code smell that points
> strongly towards a *lack of modularity* within a *complex piece of
> functionality*.
Sure, but large numbers of tiny source
On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Oct 25, 2012, at 08:15 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>>OK, I need to weigh in after seeing this kind of reply. Large source files
>>are discouraged in general because they're a code smell that points
>>strongly towards a *lack of modularity* wi
On Oct 25, 2012, at 08:15 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>OK, I need to weigh in after seeing this kind of reply. Large source files
>are discouraged in general because they're a code smell that points
>strongly towards a *lack of modularity* within a *complex piece of
>functionality*.
Modularity is goo
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 9:19 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I've received three messages in the past hour from mailman at
> python.org notifying me of various attempts to receive a password
> reminder or to remove me from python-dev. I hope they don't succeed.
Are you asking us to CC you on all
On Oct 25, 2012 2:06 AM, "Larry Hastings" wrote:
>
> On 10/23/2012 09:29 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
>>
>> Especially since you're suggesting a huge number of new files, I
question the
>> argument of better navigability.
>
>
> FWIW I'm -1 on it too. I don't see what the big deal is with "large"
sourc
On 10/24/2012 03:19 AM, Éric Araujo wrote:
Hello,
Le 12/10/2012 13:50, Petri Lehtinen a écrit :
It's two and a half weeks left, but I've not seen any announcements
yet!
Indeed, work and other commitments took over, so we (Montréal-Python)
decided to move the bug day instead of announcing it la
I've received three messages in the past hour from mailman at
python.org notifying me of various attempts to receive a password
reminder or to remove me from python-dev. I hope they don't succeed.
--
--Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido)
___
Python-Dev
On 10/23/2012 09:29 AM, Georg Brandl wrote:
Especially since you're suggesting a huge number of new files, I question the
argument of better navigability.
FWIW I'm -1 on it too. I don't see what the big deal is with "large"
source files. If you have difficulty finding your way around
unicod
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 18 Oct, 2012, at 19:29, Daniel Holth wrote:
>
>> I'd like to submit the Wheel PEPs 425 (filename metadata), 426
>> (Metadata 1.3), and 427 (wheel itself) for acceptance. The format has
>> been stable since May and we are preparing a p
On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Ronald Oussoren wrote:
>
> On 18 Oct, 2012, at 19:29, Daniel Holth wrote:
>
>> I'd like to submit the Wheel PEPs 425 (filename metadata), 426
>> (Metadata 1.3), and 427 (wheel itself) for acceptance. The format has
>> been stable since May and we are preparing a p
On 18 Oct, 2012, at 19:29, Daniel Holth wrote:
> I'd like to submit the Wheel PEPs 425 (filename metadata), 426
> (Metadata 1.3), and 427 (wheel itself) for acceptance. The format has
> been stable since May and we are preparing a patch to support it in
> pip, but we need to earn consensus befor
(Oops, originally replied only to Mark)
Is a 3x3 array greater or less than a 2x4 array or another 3x3 array?
The contents of a 1D memory view may be sortable, but the "logical
structure" part isn't, and neither is any multi-dimensional view.
I'm surprised by the lack of inheritance support thou
On 18 Oct, 2012, at 19:29, Daniel Holth wrote:
> I'd like to submit the Wheel PEPs 425 (filename metadata), 426
> (Metadata 1.3), and 427 (wheel itself) for acceptance. The format has
> been stable since May and we are preparing a patch to support it in
> pip, but we need to earn consensus befor
15 matches
Mail list logo
