On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 00:49:38 +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
> So ok to close issue16526, issue3871, issue3754 and suggest in the reports to
> start over with more granular changes?
+1 from me. Over time I've suggested to at least two people, maybe
more, who wanted to see some action on these that
[No, I'm not interested in the port myself]
patches for a mingw32 port are floating around on the web and the python bug
tracker, although most of them as a set of patches in one issue addressing
several things, and which maybe outdated for the trunk. at least for me
re-reading a big patch in a ne
On Jan 30, 2013, at 2:01 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote:
> Speaking for myself, I've been having some usefulness with making "URL"
> objects that are subclasses of str. That lets me pass them to all the
> things that already expect strs, while still having convenience methods.
str subclasses are prob
On 30Jan2013 13:26, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| Thoughts on os.path? What happened to the idea of a new path object? [...]
| From: Talin [...]
| On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
| > Hmm... Mind if I just forward to python-dev? IIRC there's been some
| > discussion about a
> Thoughts on os.path? What happened to the idea of a new path object?
You old pot stirrer!
I wonder about this from time-to-time as well, so was just interested
enough to wander over to PyPI and see what I could dig up. There are
a couple path module/package implementations on PyPI. Nothing j
http://bugs.python.org/issue11344 evolved into a patch for 'splitpath',
similar to splitall. Antoine's pathlib (PEP 428) is also mentioned
at the end, which is probably what Guido is thinking of.
--David
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013 13:26:08 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Thoughts on os.path? What hap
> Thoughts on os.path? What happened to the idea of a new path object?
I don't know if it's related, but there are two new interesting
projects: pathlib and walkdir.
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/pathlib
https://pathlib.readthedocs.org/en/latest/
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/walkdir
http://walkdir.
Thoughts on os.path? What happened to the idea of a new path object?
--Guido
-- Forwarded message --
From: Talin
Date: Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 12:34 PM
Subject: Re: I was just thinking that os.path could use some love...
To: Guido van Rossum
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 11:33 AM, Gui
On 01/30/2013 01:00 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Disable inheritance by default
(...)
* It violates the principle of least surprise. Developers using the
os module may expect that Python respects the POSIX standard and so
that close-on-exec flag is not set by default.
Oh, I just saw that Perl
> Disable inheritance by default
> (...)
> * It violates the principle of least surprise. Developers using the
> os module may expect that Python respects the POSIX standard and so
> that close-on-exec flag is not set by default.
Oh, I just saw that Perl is "violating POSIX" since Perl 1:
clo
2013/1/30 Larry Hastings :
> Here is a new version of my PEP 433.
> [...]
> * ``os.get_cloexec(fd)``
> * ``os.set_cloexec(fd, cloexec=True)``
> * ``sys.getdefaultcloexec()``
> * ``sys.setdefaultcloexec(cloexec=True)``
>
> Passing no judgment on the PEP otherwise, just a single observation: the
11 matches
Mail list logo
