On 18 Feb 2013 08:36, "Fred Drake" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> > As Daniel pointed out, easy_install and pip also don't follow this rule
yet,
> > so it won't really have any impact if we never get to metadata 3.0.
>
> Actually, my point was that using a separ
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:21 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> As Daniel pointed out, easy_install and pip also don't follow this rule yet,
> so it won't really have any impact if we never get to metadata 3.0.
Actually, my point was that using a separate filename for version 2.0 would
allow provision of
On 18 Feb 2013 04:54, "Fred Drake" wrote:
>
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Daniel Holth wrote:
> > Not likely to matter for a while as the current md v1 tools don't
understand
> > this new obsolescence rule :-)
>
> Using a separate file for post-obsolescence-rule metadata versions would
> all
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:45 PM, Daniel Holth wrote:
> Not likely to matter for a while as the current md v1 tools don't understand
> this new obsolescence rule :-)
Using a separate file for post-obsolescence-rule metadata versions would
allow coexistance, which would likely improve adoption.
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:11:23 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> Major changes since the last draft:
>
> 1. Metadata-Version is 2.0 rather than 1.3, and the field now has the
> same major.minor semantics as are defined for wheel versions in PEP
> 427 (i.e. if a tool sees a major version number it doesn'
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:11:23 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> Major changes since the last draft:
>
> 1. Metadata-Version is 2.0 rather than 1.3, and the field now has the
> same major.minor semantics as are defined for wheel versions in PEP
> 427 (i.e. if a tool sees a major version number it does
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:20:14 -0700
> Eric Snow wrote:
>> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Eric Snow
>> wrote:
>> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Antoine Pitrou
>> > wrote:
>> >> I think you should test with all pickle protocols.
>> >
On Sat, 16 Feb 2013 18:20:14 -0700
Eric Snow wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Eric Snow
> wrote:
> > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 4:45 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >> I think you should test with all pickle protocols.
> >
> > I'll do that.
>
> Out of curiousity, how critical is it to suppor
On Sun, Feb 3, 2013 at 4:37 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I don't know or care much about PyPI metadata, so do what you feel is
> right. If you are uncomfortable being PEP-uncle *and* -author, find
> another author or another uncle. But since it doesn't affect the
> language or library, it's fine
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 4:56 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2013 14:00:24 +1100, Neil Hodgson wrote:
>> Nick Coghlan:
>>
>> > - no need for extensive cross-OS testing prior to commit, that's a key
>> > part of the role of the buildbots
>>
>>Are the buildbots able to test UI featu
10 matches
Mail list logo
