On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:46 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 4 March 2013 19:40, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> Your feedback on http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 would be greatly
>> appreciated.
>
> Done directly to Antoine on IRC the other day in a conversation with
> him and Michael about the compata
On 4 March 2013 19:40, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> Your feedback on http://bugs.python.org/issue16997 would be greatly
> appreciated.
Done directly to Antoine on IRC the other day in a conversation with
him and Michael about the compatability impact of subtests. Happy to
do a full code review if that
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 4:26 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> On 4 March 2013 18:54, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Robert Collins
>> wrote:
>>> I'd like to talk about overhauling - not tweaking, overhauling - the
>>> standard library testing facilities.
>>
>> That seems li
On 4 March 2013 18:54, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Robert Collins
> wrote:
>> I'd like to talk about overhauling - not tweaking, overhauling - the
>> standard library testing facilities.
>
> That seems like too big a topic and too vague a description to discuss
> use
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 9:24 PM, Robert Collins
wrote:
> I'd like to talk about overhauling - not tweaking, overhauling - the
> standard library testing facilities.
That seems like too big a topic and too vague a description to discuss
usefully. Perhaps you have a specific proposal? Or at least ju
On 28 February 2013 05:51, Michael Foord wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> PyCon, and the Python Language Summit, is nearly upon us. We have a good
> number of people confirmed to attend. If you are intending to come to the
> language summit but haven't let me know please do so.
>
> The agenda of topics f
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 11:16:28 -0500
>> Brett Cannon wrote:
>> > > In addition, it may be appropriate for importlib to offer a
>> > > "write_module" method that accepts (module na
On Sun, Mar 3, 2013 at 6:29 AM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 18:38:15 -0500
> Brett Cannon wrote:
> > >
> > > You can deprecate the heuristic if you want (and can figure out how),
> > > but a definite -1 on removing it without at least the usual
> > > deprecation period for backwar
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 8:16 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 11:16:28 -0500
> Brett Cannon wrote:
> > > In addition, it may be appropriate for importlib to offer a
> > > "write_module" method that accepts (module name, target path,
> > > contents). This would:
> > >
> > > 1. Allow
On Mar 2, 2013, at 11:41 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Doug Hellmann wrote:
>>
>> On Feb 27, 2013, at 11:51 AM, Michael Foord wrote:
>>
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> PyCon, and the Python Language Summit, is nearly upon us. We have a good
>>> number of people confirmed
On Sat, 2 Mar 2013 18:38:15 -0500
Brett Cannon wrote:
> >
> > You can deprecate the heuristic if you want (and can figure out how),
> > but a definite -1 on removing it without at least the usual
> > deprecation period for backwards incompatible changes.
> >
>
> That part is easy: ImportWarning s
Stefan Krah, 02.03.2013 21:01:
> Stefan Behnel wrote:
I'm not so happy with the argument clinic, but that's certainly also
because I'm biased. I've written the argument unpacking code for Cython
some years ago, so it's not surprising that I'm quite happy with that and
fail to se
12 matches
Mail list logo
