On 2013-03-10 2:36 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
A) For similar reasons, I consider the proposal a first draft, and
probably not the exact right thing to do.
That is correct. The more I think about it, the more I'm convincing
myself that even though the proposal is more sane than what's there
right
On 2013-03-10 1:59 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
To be clear, just passing the stdlib tests is*not* sufficient to think
that backward compatibility is not likely to be broken. Deciding about
the likelihood of breakage is a hard problem, to which we generally
employ gut-level heuristics:) (And cod
Hi,
On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 2:58 AM, raymond.hettinger
wrote:
> http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/0f86b51f8f8b
> changeset: 82592:0f86b51f8f8b
> user:Raymond Hettinger
> date:Sun Mar 10 17:57:28 2013 -0700
> summary:
> Issue #17385: Fix quadratic behavior in threading.Conditio
On 3/10/2013 4:59 PM, R. David Murray wrote:
To be clear, just passing the stdlib tests is *not* sufficient to think
that backward compatibility is not likely to be broken. Deciding about
the likelihood of breakage is a hard problem, to which we generally
employ gut-level heuristics :) (And cod
On Sat, 09 Mar 2013 12:13:54 +1100, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On 02/03/13 02:43, Demian Brecht wrote:
> > Cross-posting from python-ideas due to no response there. Perhaps it's
> > due to a general lack of usage/caring for cookiejar, but figured
> > /someone/'s got to have an opinion about my propo
