Re: [Python-Dev] [Python-checkins] cpython: #11182: remove the unused and undocumented pydoc.Scanner class. Patch by

2013-04-19 Thread Nick Coghlan
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 9:53 AM, ezio.melotti wrote: > http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/465cb5ce5a7e > changeset: 83443:465cb5ce5a7e > user:Ezio Melotti > date:Fri Apr 19 02:53:12 2013 +0300 > summary: > #11182: remove the unused and undocumented pydoc.Scanner class. Patch by

[Python-Dev] Summary of Python tracker Issues

2013-04-19 Thread Python tracker
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2013-04-12 - 2013-04-19) Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/ To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue. Do NOT respond to this message. Issues counts and deltas: open3928 (+20) closed 25642 (+73) total 29570 (+93) Open issues wit

Re: [Python-Dev] A decade as a core dev

2013-04-19 Thread Alfredo Solano Martínez
As an average python user, thank you for your commitment, and keep up the good work! Alfredo On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Apr 18, 2013, at 07:34 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > >>Normally you should break a buildbot as a celebration :) > > Or do a release and go on vacat

Re: [Python-Dev] libffi inclusion in python

2013-04-19 Thread Ronald Oussoren
On 19 Apr, 2013, at 10:13, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Ronald Oussoren > wrote: >> Stripping libffi from python's source tree would be fine by me, but would >> require testing with upstream libffi. AFAIK system libffi on osx wouldn't be >> goog enough, it doesn'

Re: [Python-Dev] libffi inclusion in python

2013-04-19 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Ronald Oussoren wrote: > Stripping libffi from python's source tree would be fine by me, but would > require testing with upstream libffi. AFAIK system libffi on osx wouldn't be > goog enough, it doesn't work properly with clang. If you mean http://bugs.python.