On 08/06/13 15:18, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Ethan Furman writes:
Enumerations can be pickled and unpickled::
from enum import Enum
class Fruit(Enum):
... tomato = 1
... banana = 2
... cherry = 3
...
from pickle
On 06/07/2013 11:45 PM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
On 08/06/13 15:18, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Ethan Furman writes:
Enumerations can be pickled and unpickled::
from enum import Enum
class Fruit(Enum):
... tomato = 1
... banana = 2
...
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt,
*.py, *.c and *.h files. I think it would be worthwhile to update the
source code and documentation for more modern RFCs.
For example for updating RFC3548 to RFC4648 there is an issue #16995.
821: Simple Mail Transfer
08.06.13 10:03, Ethan Furman написав(ла):
Indeed, and it is already in several different ways. But it would be
nice to have a pickle example in the docs that worked with doctest.
I ended up doing what Barry did:
from test.test_enum import Fruit
from pickle import dumps, loads
2013/6/8 Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt,
*.py, *.c and *.h files. I think it would be worthwhile to update the source
code and documentation for more modern RFCs.
Just because you change the reference, doesn't mean
On 08.06.2013 09:45, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt, *.py,
*.c and *.h files. I
think it would be worthwhile to update the source code and documentation for
more modern RFCs.
Thanks for creating such a list.
BTW: What is
08.06.13 11:23, Benjamin Peterson написав(ла):
2013/6/8 Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt,
*.py, *.c and *.h files. I think it would be worthwhile to update the source
code and documentation for more modern RFCs.
Just
On 06/08/2013 01:07 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
08.06.13 10:03, Ethan Furman написав(ла):
Indeed, and it is already in several different ways. But it would be
nice to have a pickle example in the docs that worked with doctest.
I ended up doing what Barry did:
from test.test_enum import
08.06.13 11:42, M.-A. Lemburg написав(ла):
On 08.06.2013 09:45, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt, *.py,
*.c and *.h files. I
think it would be worthwhile to update the source code and documentation for
more modern RFCs.
Thanks
By mistake some local files were added to the list. Here's an updated
list. It now also contains low-case references.
Attached also a script used to generate this list.
3: Documentation conventions. (Obsoleted by RFC0010)
Lib/test/math_testcases.txt
10: Documentation conventions. (Obsoleted
08.06.13 11:47, Ethan Furman написав(ла):
In this case it is better to exclude a code example from doctests or
add auxiliary code (i.e. as Steven suggested) to pass the doctest.
Are you saying there is something wrong about what I have in place now?
I would think that one line showing
On 2013-06-08 10:59, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
08.06.13 11:23, Benjamin Peterson ... :
2013/6/8 Serhiy Storchaka ... :
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt,
*.py, *.c and *.h files. I think it would be worthwhile to update the
source
code and documentation for
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 12:51:23 +0300, Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com
wrote:
08.06.13 11:42, M.-A. Lemburg напиÑав(ла):
On 08.06.2013 09:45, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst, *.txt,
*.py, *.c and *.h files. I
think it
On 06/08/2013 03:09 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
08.06.13 11:47, Ethan Furman написав(ла):
In this case it is better to exclude a code example from doctests or
add auxiliary code (i.e. as Steven suggested) to pass the doctest.
Are you saying there is something wrong about what I have in place
Serhiy Storchaka writes:
08.06.13 11:23, Benjamin Peterson написав(ла):
2013/6/8 Serhiy Storchaka storch...@gmail.com:
Here is attached a list of obsoleted RFCs referred in the *.rst,
*.txt, *.py, *.c and *.h files. I think it would be worthwhile
to update the source code and
On 6/8/13, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 06/08/2013 03:09 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
08.06.13 11:47, Ethan Furman написав(ла):
[...]
Fair point. But I suppose that if the end-user is running a doc test, it is
not too much to require that the other
tests be installed as well.
On 8 June 2013 17:41, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 06/08/2013 03:09 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Is it possible to add invisible code which doesn't displayed in the
resulting documentation, but taken into account by
doctest?
I have no idea. This is my first time using doctest.
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 19:54:18 +0200, =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz_Rekucki?=
lreku...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 June 2013 17:41, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 06/08/2013 03:09 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Is it possible to add invisible code which doesn't displayed in the
resulting
Expected behaviour:
float('\N{MINUS SIGN}12.34')
-12.34
Current behaviour:
Traceback (most recent call last):
...
ValueError: could not convert string to float: '−12.34'
Please note: '\N{MINUS SIGN}' == '\u2212'
--
Best regards,
Łukasz Langa
WWW: http://lukasz.langa.pl/
Twitter: @llanga
[Diverting to python-ideas, since this isn't as clear-cut as you think.]
Why exactly is that expected behavior? What's the use case? (Surely
you don't have a keyboard that generates \u2212 when you hit the minus
key? :-)
Is there a Unicode standard for parsing numbers? IIRC there are a
variety
On 08/06/2013 23:30, Guido van Rossum wrote:
[Diverting to python-ideas, since this isn't as clear-cut as you think.]
Why exactly is that expected behavior? What's the use case? (Surely
you don't have a keyboard that generates \u2212 when you hit the minus
key? :-)
Is there a Unicode standard
On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 01:39:59 +0100, MRAB pyt...@mrabarnett.plus.com wrote:
On 08/06/2013 23:30, Guido van Rossum wrote:
[Diverting to python-ideas, since this isn't as clear-cut as you think.]
Why exactly is that expected behavior? What's the use case? (Surely
you don't have a keyboard
On 9 June 2013 04:17, R. David Murray rdmur...@bitdance.com wrote:
On Sat, 08 Jun 2013 19:54:18 +0200, =?UTF-8?Q?=C5=81ukasz_Rekucki?=
lreku...@gmail.com wrote:
On 8 June 2013 17:41, Ethan Furman et...@stoneleaf.us wrote:
On 06/08/2013 03:09 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Is it possible to
On 06/08/2013 09:21 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Using the test suite in the enum docstrings initially is fine. In the
future, once we migrate a module like socket to using enum.IntEnum
instead of bare integers, it would be appropriate to change the enum
docs to reference that rather than the test
24 matches
Mail list logo
