On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 11:59 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Thanks for the clarification. It all SGTM.
I've updated the PEP and the reference implementation. If I've missed
anything please let me know. There is only one thing I thought of
that I'd like to get an opinion on:
In the Finders section,
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 1:52 PM, Eric Snow wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Nick Coghlan
> wrote:
> >> At the time when find_spec runs, sys.modules hasn't been touched yet, so
> >> the old module state is still available when reload
On Fri, 01 Nov 2013 22:50:28 +0530, Anup Kumar
wrote:
> My name is Anup. I am pursuing my Enginering degree at Amrita in India. I
> want to start contributing to PSF by fixing bugs and if possible by helping
> to develop the python software. So, I request some one to help me for that.
Welcome, A
On Fri, Nov 1, 2013 at 7:35 AM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>> At the time when find_spec runs, sys.modules hasn't been touched yet, so
>> the old module state is still available when reloading. Passing the spec in
>> lets the loader decide whether o
Hi,
My name is Anup. I am pursuing my Enginering degree at Amrita in India. I
want to start contributing to PSF by fixing bugs and if possible by helping
to develop the python software. So, I request some one to help me for that.
Thanks in advance,
Regards,
A. Anup,
2nd Year CSE, Amrita Universi
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 4:10 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
> However, perhaps it makes more sense to pass the entire existing module,
> rather than just the spec?
Sounds good to me. :)
-eric
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.pyth
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2013-10-25 - 2013-11-01)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open4217 (+18)
closed 27029 (+64)
total 31246 (+82)
Open issues wit
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> On 1 Nov 2013 01:37, "PJ Eby" wrote:
> . ;-)
> >
> > I also suspect, that if properly spelled out, those use cases are
> > going to boil down to:
> >
> > 1. Throwing errors if you have an existing module object you can't
> > load into, an
