Just don't run it on Windows...
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I would be rather worried about some accidental Trojen running that way.
>
> ___
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mai
On 03Dec2013 08:25, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I would be rather worried about some accidental Trojen running that way.
Or even just a badly framed clean-up-temp-files step.
--
Cameron Simpson
manual, n.:
A unit of documentation. There are always three or more on a given item.
One is on the she
I would be rather worried about some accidental Trojen running that way.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-
Greetings, comrades!
Having handled these two issues personally:
http://bugs.python.org/issue19877
- test related with symlink fails on Windows Vista with administrator
account (in Windows NT 6, only account in administrator group can
create symlink)
http://bugs.python.org/issue18678
- bug in spw
Hi Reuben,
Thanks for reporting this. I've had a similar report recently in the Tulip
tracker (http://code.google.com/p/tulip/issues/detail?id=89). But the
problem seems with the use of SO_REUSEPORT in the test.support package's
bind_port() helper.
This really belongs in the Python issue tracker
Greetings, learned Python devs!
Apologies in advance if my message is misdirected. I'm building Python
3.3.2-r2 from Gentoo's Portage tree [1] and encountered two failed tests
which probably should not have been attempted on my OS (Gentoo 3.7.10):
test_bind_port and test_find_unused_port both use
