On 12/09/2013 11:52 AM, Allen Li wrote:
Pros:
Save a lot of lines defining interface-like ABCs, especially in small
scripts without docstrings (bad practice, but I do it often =))
If the only pro is encouraging bad practice, it's not going to happen. ;)
Cons:
Do we need it?
In my opinion,
I just wanted to sum up this thread of discussion.
Proposal:
A function in abc to provide a default abstract method
implementation.
foo = make_abstractmethod('foo', ['self'])
is the same as
@abc.abstractmethod
def foo(self):
pass
Details:
Default behavior, if implemented, should probably b
The troll is successful already. Read the other thread. :-(
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 10:37 AM, Sreenivas Reddy T
wrote:
> Am i the one who feels we do not add any value by doing this?
>
> Best Regards,
> Srinivas Reddy Thatiparthy
> 9703888668.
>
> "Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tri
Am i the one who feels we do not add any value by doing this?
Best Regards,
Srinivas Reddy Thatiparthy
9703888668.
"Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new !!! "
--Albert Einstein
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 11:43 PM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
> > We could always run random.sh
> We could always run random.shuffle() on the current list
> so new additions don't look out of place ;)
Wouldn't that bloat the repository with diffs and make merges more difficult?
Skip
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.
On Sun, 2013-12-08 at 05:29 -0500, R. David Murray wrote:
> As far as we have been able to determine, Tae Wong is in fact a bot
> (note the 'seo' in the email address...a tip of the hand, as far as
> I can see). We have removed all access permissions (including email)
> from the related account on
On Mon, 09 Dec 2013 10:22:18 -0500, John Wong wrote:
> Looks like a human to me instead, or some kind of smart AI. look he just
> responded again.
Could be. He's never responded to a direct question on the bug tracker,
though, just posts a new comment with some loose connection to the first
comm
Please look up his name in the archives. We've gone through this
before. He sends posts like this to many lists and there is never any
value to it (but it's hard to prove since usually 1-2 of the people in
his list really did contribute or are at least known to the target
audience). His motivations
Looks like a human to me instead, or some kind of smart AI. look he just
responded again.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 5:29 AM, R. David Murray wrote:
> As far as we have been able to determine, Tae Wong is in fact a bot
> (note the 'seo' in the email address...a tip of the hand, as far as
> I can see
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 8:57 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Dec 09, 2013, at 04:00 PM, TaeWong wrote:
>
>>The name Jonas Wagner comes before Zachary Ware and Barry Warsaw.
>
> Maybe it's time to give up on trying to sort by last name, and just sort by
> first character?
>
> No, this is not a bold att
On Dec 09, 2013, at 04:00 PM, TaeWong wrote:
>The name Jonas Wagner comes before Zachary Ware and Barry Warsaw.
Maybe it's time to give up on trying to sort by last name, and just sort by
first character?
No, this is not a bold attempt to jump higher up in the list.
-AABarry
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 10:28:17 +0100
Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2013/12/9 Serhiy Storchaka :
> > But tracemalloc doesn't count memory allocated besides Python allocators
> > (e.g. memory for executable, static variables and stack, memory allocated by
> > extensions and C lib, unallocated but no
There is a sorting error:
The name Jonas Wagner comes before Zachary Ware and Barry Warsaw.
Please correct sorting error so that his name appears between Sjoerd de Vries
and Niki W. Waibel.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://ma
Please add access permissions on the Python bug tracker for the seotaewong40
account.
For what it's worth, you need to add Marien Zwart to Misc/ACKS (apparently he
has contributed to the GNU Emacs mode for Python).
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-D
Hi,
2013/12/9 Serhiy Storchaka :
> But tracemalloc doesn't count memory allocated besides Python allocators
> (e.g. memory for executable, static variables and stack, memory allocated by
> extensions and C lib, unallocated but not returned to OS dynamical memory).
> When you want investigate how y
09.12.13 03:56, Victor Stinner написав(ла):
On Linux, it's possible to limit globally the "address space" of a
process, but this value is not convinient. For example, the address
space includes shared memory and read-only memory mappings of files,
whereas this memory should not reduce the memory
16 matches
Mail list logo
