On 5/29/2014 1:22 AM, INADA Naoki wrote:
We would like to stress that we don't believe anything on this list is as
important as the continuing efforts that everyone in the broader ecosystem
is making. If you just want to ease the transition by working on anything
at all, the best use of your tim
> We would like to stress that we don't believe anything on this list is as
> important as the continuing efforts that everyone in the broader ecosystem
> is making. If you just want to ease the transition by working on anything
> at all, the best use of your time right now is porting
> https://wa
On Wed, May 28, 2014, at 15:26, Glyph Lefkowitz wrote:
> Add some warnings about python 3 compatibility.
> It should at least be possible to get a warning for every single implicit
> string coercion.
> Old-style classes.
> Old-style division.
Fun fact: This can be achieved with the -Qwarn comman
Thanks for for putting this together.
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Glyph Lefkowitz
wrote:
> At the language summit, Alex and I volunteered to put together some
> recommendations on what changes could be made to Python (the language) in
> order to facilitate a smoother transition from Python 2
At the language summit, Alex and I volunteered to put together some
recommendations on what changes could be made to Python (the language) in order
to facilitate a smoother transition from Python 2 to Python 3. One of the
things that motivated this was the (surprising, to us) consideration that
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On May 29, 2014, at 07:37 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>
>>Debian Testing (Jessie) ships both 3.3 and 3.4, with the 'python3'
>>package pulling in 3.3. That may change before Jessie becomes stable,
>>I don't know.
>
> It already has:
>
> https://
On May 29, 2014, at 07:37 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
>Debian Testing (Jessie) ships both 3.3 and 3.4, with the 'python3'
>package pulling in 3.3. That may change before Jessie becomes stable,
>I don't know.
It already has:
https://lists.debian.org/debian-python/2014/05/msg00162.html
The question
On Thu, May 29, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Victor Stinner
wrote:
> 2014-05-28 22:05 GMT+02:00 Eli Bendersky :
>> Most Linux installs go through package managers which don't count here, no?
>
> For Debian, there is the "popcorn" project which provides some statistics:
>
> http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?pack
2014-05-28 22:05 GMT+02:00 Eli Bendersky :
> Most Linux installs go through package managers which don't count here, no?
For Debian, there is the "popcorn" project which provides some statistics:
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=python2.6
http://qa.debian.org/popcon.php?package=python2.7
h
On May 28, 2014 4:06 PM, "Eli Bendersky" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Guido van Rossum
wrote:
>>
>> Is the Windows/Mac ratio still 70/30, with Linux in the single digits?
>>
>
> Most Linux installs go through package managers which don't count here,
no?
I'll have to run som
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Is the Windows/Mac ratio still 70/30, with Linux in the single digits?
>
>
Most Linux installs go through package managers which don't count here, no?
Eli
>
> On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Brian Curtin wrote:
>
>> On May 28, 2014
Is the Windows/Mac ratio still 70/30, with Linux in the single digits?
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 10:57 AM, Brian Curtin wrote:
> On May 28, 2014 12:49 PM, "Brian Curtin" wrote:
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Antoine Pitrou
> wrote:
> > > I don't think we have recent download numbers s
On May 28, 2014 12:49 PM, "Brian Curtin" wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Antoine Pitrou
wrote:
> > I don't think we have recent download numbers since the Website
> > overhaul (do we?), but Python 3 isn't an "experimental concept
> > language" anymore (it hasn't been since 3.3 or 3.2,
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> I don't think we have recent download numbers since the Website
> overhaul (do we?), but Python 3 isn't an "experimental concept
> language" anymore (it hasn't been since 3.3 or 3.2, I'd say).
Using the old logs, which are still good throug
Hello!
Stumbling over problems on AIX (Modules/python.exp not found) building libxml2
as python module
let me wonder about the intended use-cases for 'python-config' and 'pkg-config
python'.
FWIW, I can see these distinct use cases here, and I'm kindly asking if I got
them right:
* Build an a
15 matches
Mail list logo
