Le mardi 15 juillet 2014, Ben Hoyt benh...@gmail.com a écrit :
Victor had one other question:
What happens to name and full_name with followlinks=True?
Do they contain the name in the directory (name of the symlink)
or name of the linked file?
I would say they should contain the name
On 14 Jul 2014 11:41, Brett Cannon br...@python.org wrote:
I agree for PEP 3121 which is the initialization/finalization work. The
stable ABi is not necessary. So maybe we should re-examine the patches and
accept the bits that clean up init/finalization and leave out any
ABi-related changes.
On 14 Jul 2014 22:50, Ben Hoyt benh...@gmail.com wrote:
In light of that, I propose I update the PEP to basically follow
Victor's model of is_X() and stat() following symlinks by default, and
allowing you to specify follow_symlinks=False if you want something
other than that.
Victor had one
Looks doable. Just make sure the cached entries reflect the
'follow_symlinks' setting -- so a symlink could end up with both an lstat
cached entry and a stat cached entry.
Yes, good point -- basically the functions will use the _stat cache if
follow_symlinks=True, otherwise the _lstat cache.
Sorry, I don't remember who but someone proposed to add the follow_symlinks
parameter in scandir() directly. If the parameter is added to methods,
there is no such issue.
Yeah, I think having the DirEntry methods do different things
depending on how scandir() was called is a really bad idea.
I'd *keep DirEntry.lstat() method* regardless of existence of
.stat(*, follow_symlinks=True) method (despite the slight violation of
DRY principle) for readability. `dir_entry.lstat().st_mode` is more
consice than `dir_entry.stat(follow_symlinks=False).st_mode` and the
meaning of lstat is
On 15 July 2014 13:19, Ben Hoyt benh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hmmm, perhaps. You suggest .full_name implies it's the absolute path,
which isn't true. I don't mind .path, but it kind of sounds like the
Path object associated with this entry. I think full_name is fine
-- it's not abs_name.
On 07/14/2014 11:25 PM, Victor Stinner wrote:
Again: remove any garantee about the cache in the definitions of methods,
instead copy the doc from os.path and os. Add a global remark saying that
most methods don't need any syscall in general, except for symlinks (with
follow_symlinks=True).
In article
CAPTjJmoZHLfT3G4eqV+=zcvbpf65fkcmah9h_8p162uha7f...@mail.gmail.com,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com wrote:
I can achieve what I need by constructing a set on the âitemsâ of the
dict.
On 2014-07-16 00:48, Russell E. Owen wrote:
In article
CAPTjJmoZHLfT3G4eqV+=zcvbpf65fkcmah9h_8p162uha7f...@mail.gmail.com,
Chris Angelico ros...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 12:04 AM, Jason R. Coombs jar...@jaraco.com wrote:
I can achieve what I need by constructing a set on the
I was going to stay out of this one...
On 14Jul2014 10:25, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
2014-07-14 4:17 GMT+02:00 Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com:
Or the ever popular symlink to . (or a directory higher in the tree).
. and .. are explicitly ignored by os.listdir() an
11 matches
Mail list logo
