Le 30/07/2014 15:48, Serhiy Storchaka a écrit :
Ignoring tests and comments my patch adds/removes/modifies about 200
lines, and David's patch -- about 150 lines of code. But it's __sizeof__
looks not correct, correcting it requires changing about 50 lines. In
sum the complexity of both patches i
I'd like to point out a couple of compiler warnings on Windows:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 6:45 PM, antoine.pitrou
wrote:
> diff --git a/Modules/_io/bytesio.c b/Modules/_io/bytesio.c
> --- a/Modules/_io/bytesio.c
> +++ b/Modules/_io/bytesio.c
> @@ -33,6 +37,45 @@
> return NULL; \
> }
>
30.07.14 16:59, Antoine Pitrou написав(ла):
Le 30/07/2014 02:11, Serhiy Storchaka a écrit :
30.07.14 06:59, Serhiy Storchaka написав(ла):
30.07.14 02:45, antoine.pitrou написав(ла):
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/79a5fbe2c78f
changeset: 91935:79a5fbe2c78f
parent: 91933:fbd104359ef8
u
Am 14.07.14 15:57, schrieb Tim Tisdall:
> Also, is there a method to test changes against all the different *nix
> variations? Is Bluez the standard across the different *nix variations?
Perhaps not the answer you expected, but: Python uses autoconf for
feature testing. You can be certain that th
Hi Serhiy,
At least conceptually, 15381 seems the better approach, but getting a
correct implementation may take more iterations than the (IMHO) simpler
change in 22003. For my tastes, the current 15381 implementation seems a
little too magical in relying on Py_REFCNT() as the sole indication that
Le 30/07/2014 02:11, Serhiy Storchaka a écrit :
30.07.14 06:59, Serhiy Storchaka написав(ла):
30.07.14 02:45, antoine.pitrou написав(ла):
http://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/79a5fbe2c78f
changeset: 91935:79a5fbe2c78f
parent: 91933:fbd104359ef8
user:Antoine Pitrou
date:Tue
On 30 July 2014 01:40, Victor Stinner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You should read the Python Developer Guide:
>
> https://docs.python.org/devguide/
>
> You can also join the core mentorship mailing list:
>
> http://pythonmentors.com/
For python.org *itself* (as in, the Django application now powering
the s
