[Python-Dev] Any volunteers to implement PEP 479?

2015-01-06 Thread Guido van Rossum
There's a proof of concept patch in http://bugs.python.org/issue22906, but it doesn't have the __future__ import and probably gets other details wrong. Reference: PEP 479 -- Change StopIteration handling inside generators -- --Guido van Rossum (python.

Re: [Python-Dev] python 2.7.9 regression in argparse?

2015-01-06 Thread Ryan Gonzalez
I thought of this exact comment when I read the "bug fix considered a regression." On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote: > There's an obligatory XKCD reference for this: http://xkcd.com/1172/ > > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > >> On 1/6/2015 7:39 AM, Vic

Re: [Python-Dev] python 2.7.9 regression in argparse?

2015-01-06 Thread Guido van Rossum
There's an obligatory XKCD reference for this: http://xkcd.com/1172/ On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 1/6/2015 7:39 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: > >> More context: >> >> 2014-12-19 12:43 GMT+01:00 anatoly techtonik : >> >>> https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho/pull/121 >>>

Re: [Python-Dev] python 2.7.9 regression in argparse?

2015-01-06 Thread Terry Reedy
On 1/6/2015 7:39 AM, Victor Stinner wrote: More context: 2014-12-19 12:43 GMT+01:00 anatoly techtonik : https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho/pull/121 The link mentions the following changeset: --- changeset: 93122:1a3143752db2 branch: 2.7 parent: 93112:927cca0b9337 user:

Re: [Python-Dev] New Windows installer for Python 3.5

2015-01-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 7 January 2015 at 00:12, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 23:56:30 +1000 > Nick Coghlan wrote: >> "pip" is problematic on Linux as well (due to the pip/pip3 split at >> the system level). Hence this section in the stdlib docs: >> https://docs.python.org/3/installing/#work-with-multip

Re: [Python-Dev] Issue 22619 at bugs.python.org

2015-01-06 Thread Mason Hill
Thank you for pointing this out. That's what I meant when I asked to "say what's wrong with it " :-) I fixed the latest patch and uploaded it. On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 7:48 AM, Stefan Ring wrote: > On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Dmitry Kazakov wrote: >> Greetings. >> >> I'm sorry if I'm too insis

Re: [Python-Dev] New Windows installer for Python 3.5

2015-01-06 Thread Antoine Pitrou
On Tue, 6 Jan 2015 23:56:30 +1000 Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 5 January 2015 at 18:17, Paul Moore wrote: > > On 5 January 2015 at 01:20, Steve Dower wrote: > >> I think this means the best way to make multiple versions work properly is > >> to rename python.exe to python3.5.exe, then install the

Re: [Python-Dev] New Windows installer for Python 3.5

2015-01-06 Thread Paul Moore
On 6 January 2015 at 13:56, Nick Coghlan wrote: >> If we can't get PATH sorted out, we need to do something about this, >> IMO. I don't know what (believe me, I tried to find a solution) >> unfortunately. > > I personally believe we should aim to make the "Windows" section in > the above link univ

Re: [Python-Dev] New Windows installer for Python 3.5

2015-01-06 Thread Nick Coghlan
On 5 January 2015 at 18:17, Paul Moore wrote: > On 5 January 2015 at 01:20, Steve Dower wrote: >> I think this means the best way to make multiple versions work properly is >> to rename python.exe to python3.5.exe, then install the launcher as >> python.exe and python3.exe (with some logic to l

Re: [Python-Dev] Issue 22619 at bugs.python.org

2015-01-06 Thread Stefan Ring
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 8:52 AM, Dmitry Kazakov wrote: > Greetings. > > I'm sorry if I'm too insistent, but it's not truly rewarding to > constantly improve a patch that no one appears to need. Again, I > understand people are busy working and/or reviewing critical patches, > but 2 months of inacti

Re: [Python-Dev] python 2.7.9 regression in argparse?

2015-01-06 Thread Victor Stinner
More context: 2014-12-19 12:43 GMT+01:00 anatoly techtonik : > https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho/pull/121 The link mentions the following changeset: --- changeset: 93122:1a3143752db2 branch: 2.7 parent: 93112:927cca0b9337 user:R David Murray date:Fri Oct 17 20:07

Re: [Python-Dev] Issue 22619 at bugs.python.org

2015-01-06 Thread Victor Stinner
http://bugs.python.org/issue22619 "Possible implementation of negative limit for traceback functions" I see that Serhiy Storchaka reviewed a patch. Victor ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-

[Python-Dev] python 2.7.9 regression in argparse?

2015-01-06 Thread anatoly techtonik
https://github.com/nickstenning/honcho/pull/121 -- anatoly t. ___ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.c

[Python-Dev] Issue 22619 at bugs.python.org

2015-01-06 Thread Dmitry Kazakov
Greetings. I'm sorry if I'm too insistent, but it's not truly rewarding to constantly improve a patch that no one appears to need. Again, I understand people are busy working and/or reviewing critical patches, but 2 months of inactivity is not right. Yes, I posted a message yesterday, but no one s