Re: [Python-Dev] contributing to multiprocessing

On 9 January 2015 at 14:20, Davin Potts wrote: > Thanks! That sounds like a nice, clear path forward. > > Regarding the doc issues being a bit more problematic to work through, I > thoroughly understand. In the case of changes to the multiprocessing docs, accepting larger restructures would mai

Re: [Python-Dev] datetime nanosecond support (ctd?)

FWIW issue23084 was withdrawn as it appears to be touching and PEP sized, and/or anyways nanosec is defacto just an int. another patch went to http://bugs.python.org/issue15443 seemingly under the radar, I'm not arguing the quality of the patch, but bringing it up here in case with the holidays

Re: [Python-Dev] contributing to multiprocessing

Thanks! That sounds like a nice, clear path forward. Regarding the doc issues being a bit more problematic to work through, I thoroughly understand. Davin On Jan 8, 2015, at 21:19, R. David Murray wrote: > On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:08:07 -0800, Ethan Furman wrote: >> On 01/08/2015 03:21 PM,

Re: [Python-Dev] contributing to multiprocessing

On Thu, 08 Jan 2015 17:08:07 -0800, Ethan Furman wrote: > On 01/08/2015 03:21 PM, Davin Potts wrote: > > > > I am interested in making some serious ongoing contributions around > > multiprocessing. > > Great! > > > Rather than me simply walking through that backlog, offering comments or > > e

Re: [Python-Dev] contributing to multiprocessing

On 01/08/2015 03:21 PM, Davin Potts wrote: > > I am interested in making some serious ongoing contributions around > multiprocessing. Great! > Rather than me simply walking through that backlog, offering comments or > encouragement here and there on issues, it > makes more sense for me to ask:

[Python-Dev] contributing to multiprocessing

Hi all -- I am interested in making some serious ongoing contributions around multiprocessing. My inspiration, first and foremost, comes from the current documentation for multiprocessing. There is great material there but I believe it is being presented in a way that hinders adoption and unders

Re: [Python-Dev] My thinking about the development process

On Thu, Jan 8, 2015 at 12:59 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 6 December 2014 at 06:04, Brett Cannon wrote: > > # Next steps > > I'm thinking first draft PEPs by February 1 to know who's all-in (8 weeks > > away), all details worked out in final PEPs and whatever is required to > > prove to me it wi

Re: [Python-Dev] My thinking about the development process

> On Jan 8, 2015, at 4:26 AM, Tymoteusz Jankowski > wrote: > > I did a pull-request with current progress: > https://github.com/python/psf-salt/pull/25 > > Any feedback is appreciated. > Btw: Donald is very patient and helpful. :) Ah oops, I forgo

Re: [Python-Dev] My thinking about the development process

I did a pull-request with current progress: https://github.com/python/psf-salt/pull/25 Any feedback is appreciated. Btw: Donald is very patient and helpful. :) On Thu Jan 08 2015 at 8:00:59 AM Nick Coghlan wrote: > On 6 December 2014 at 06:04, Brett Cannon wrote: > > # Next steps > > I'm think