On 01/09/2015 05:01 PM, David Anthoff wrote:
> On 01/09/2015 04:09 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
>> The only reason I hesitate on this is that it could cause significant
>> confusion for someone who doesn't really understand the implications,
>> while people like yourself who have thought about this are
> I'll look into this, but it probably isn't going to work as part of the
installer. I
> have previously looked into being able to install arbitrary side-by-side
copies
> of Python, but that's near impossible as well. Windows Installer doesn't
really
> let you just copy files - it isn't part of its
David Anthoff wrote:
> It would be great if the new installer supported silent, portable installs.
> What I have in mind is a silent installation that drops all the necessary
> files
> for a working python into a folder, but does not put ANY file anywhere else
> and
> does not register anything a
On 1/9/2015 12:34 PM, David Anthoff wrote:
Nothing is merged in yet and everything can still change, so I'm keen to
hear whatever
feedback people have. I've tried to make improvements fairly for
first-time users
through to sysadmins, but if I've missed something big I'd like to hear
about it
> Nothing is merged in yet and everything can still change, so I'm keen to
hear whatever
> feedback people have. I've tried to make improvements fairly for
first-time users
> through to sysadmins, but if I've missed something big I'd like to hear
about it before
> we get too close to alpha 1.
It w
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2015-01-02 - 2015-01-09)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open4726 (+20)
closed 30244 (+37)
total 34970 (+57)
Open issues wit
