On Feb 18, 2015, at 09:16 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
>That covers mime types, but not file extensions, so it's not really
>what *I* thought Barry was talking about.
I was actually thinking about both. :)
The Wikipedia page has several external links to collections of file
extensions, but I don't know
On 18 February 2015 at 20:48, Jim J. Jewett wrote:
> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>> I don't know exactly what the procedure would be to claim .pyz for *nix,
>>> e.g. updating /etc/mime.types, but I think the PEP should at least mention
>>> this. I think we want to get as official support for .pyz files
Barry Warsaw wrote:
>> I don't know exactly what the procedure would be to claim .pyz for *nix,
>> e.g. updating /etc/mime.types, but I think the PEP should at least mention
>> this. I think we want to get as official support for .pyz files on *nix as
>> possible.
Paul Moore wrote:
> I'll add a
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015, at 23:06, Blaxton wrote:
> Hi Zach,
> I think it is best to remove the .spec file if it is not supported by
> Python developers.It is misleading to ship unsupported file within source
> tree.
I agree, so I just removed it.
___
Pyt
