On 02/24/2015 05:56 PM, Gregory P. Smith wrote:
inspect.getargspec(method) and inspect.signature(method) both include
the 'self' parameter but how are we to figure out from method itself
that it is actually bound and that its first parameter is expected to
be a bound instance?
Given the
On 25 February 2015 at 11:43, Ryan Gonzalez rym...@gmail.com wrote:
Ask on python-list. Also check out the FAQ and the Help page. Not sure what
your problem is; Python is EXTREMELY well documented.
The core Python docs aren't bad, but getting the full scientific
Python stack up and running is
On 24 February 2015 at 18:58, Guido van Rossum guido at python.org wrote:
The naming of the functions feels inconsistent -- maybe pack(directory,
target) - create_archive(directory, archive), and set_interpreter() -
copy_archive(archive, new_archive)?
Paul Moore wrote:
One possible source
On 25 February 2015 at 16:02, Jim J. Jewett jimjjew...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 February 2015 at 18:58, Guido van Rossum guido at python.org wrote:
The naming of the functions feels inconsistent -- maybe pack(directory,
target) - create_archive(directory, archive), and set_interpreter() -
I'm back, I've re-read the PEP, and I've re-read the long thread with (no
subject).
I think Georg Brandl nailed it:
*I like the sequence and dict flattening part of the PEP, mostly because
itis consistent and should be easy to understand, but the comprehension
syntaxenhancements seem to
On Feb 25, 2015, at 07:33 PM, Paul Moore wrote:
The module defines two convenience functions:
.. function:: create_archive(directory, target=None, interpreter=None,
main=None)
Create an application archive from *source*. The source can be any
of the following:
I think you meant
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2015 at 17:06, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
I've included the resulting API
documentation below. It looks pretty good to me.
Me too. I have a few nits anyhow.
.. function::
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:33 PM Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2015 at 17:06, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the difference between create and copy important? e.g., is there
anything wrong with
create_archive(old_archive, output=new_archive) working as
So...
There was a recent discussion here on porting Python to Android. Well, for
those of you who saw too many unread messages and marked the whole thread
as read like I usually do, I helped Cyd figure out some patches that make
it work. Cyd then opened Issue 23496
On 25 February 2015 at 17:06, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
Is the difference between create and copy important? e.g., is there
anything wrong with
create_archive(old_archive, output=new_archive) working as well as
create_archive(directory, archive)?
Probably not, now. The
On 25 February 2015 at 20:12, Jim J. Jewett jimjjew...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Feb 25, 2015 at 2:33 PM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 25 February 2015 at 17:06, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
I've included the resulting API
documentation below. It looks pretty good to me.
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 11:07 AM, Benjamin Peterson benja...@python.org wrote:
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014, at 00:33, David Bolen wrote:
Yeah, it definitely needs it. Historically it was intentional as my own
servers were all on 8.04, but the last of those moved 12.04 last year.
I think there's
On 24 February 2015 at 18:58, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
The naming of the functions feels inconsistent -- maybe pack(directory,
target) - create_archive(directory, archive), and set_interpreter() -
copy_archive(archive, new_archive)?
One possible source of confusion with
On 24.02.15 21:01, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com
mailto:p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 February 2015 at 18:24, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org
mailto:gu...@python.org wrote:
I'd specify that when the output argument is
14 matches
Mail list logo
