On 10.05.15 21:28, Larry Hastings wrote:
In Python's argument parsing code (convertsimple in Python/getargs.c), a
couple of format units* accept "read-only bytes-like objects", aka
read-only buffer objects. They call a helper function called
convertbuffer() which uses the buffer protocol to extr
In Python's argument parsing code (convertsimple in Python/getargs.c), a
couple of format units* accept "read-only bytes-like objects", aka
read-only buffer objects. They call a helper function called
convertbuffer() which uses the buffer protocol to extract a pointer to
the memory.
Here'
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 9:07 PM, Carol Willing <
willi...@willingconsulting.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/10/15 10:29 AM, Tal Einat wrote:
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:04 AM Skip Montanaro
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I haven't run the test suite in
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 5:07 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>
> On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:04 AM Skip Montanaro
> wrote:
>
>> I haven't run the test suite in awhile. I am in the midst of running it
>> on my Mac running Yosemite 10.10.3. Twice now, I've gotten this popup:
>>
>>
>>
>> I assume this i
On 05/09/2015 11:22 PM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
On 10.05.15 02:25, Ian Cordasco wrote:
Can you share how you gathered them so someone could run them on a
64-bit build?
This is quick and dirty patch. It generates 8 GB log file!
I ran it under 64-bit Linux. Actually it generated a 10GB log fi
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 10:04 AM Skip Montanaro
wrote:
> I haven't run the test suite in awhile. I am in the midst of running it on
> my Mac running Yosemite 10.10.3. Twice now, I've gotten this popup:
>
>
>
> I assume this is testing some server listening on localhost. Is this a new
> thing, e
I haven't run the test suite in awhile. I am in the midst of running it on
my Mac running Yosemite 10.10.3. Twice now, I've gotten this popup:
I assume this is testing some server listening on localhost. Is this a new
thing, either with the Python test suite or with Mac OS X? (I'd normally be
h
Glenn Linderman wrote:
> Is this going to get released in 3.5, I hope? Python 3 is pretty
> limited without some solution for Unicode on the console... probably the
> biggest deficiency I have found in Python 3, since its introduction. It
> has great Unicode support for files and processing, which
Here is comparable statistic collected from tests ran with an executable
buil with COUNT_ALLOCS.
typecount % acc.%
tuple 448855278 29.50% 29.50%
frame 203515969 13.38% 42.88%
str
