Hi Ben,
On 2015-05-31 8:35 AM, Ben Leslie wrote:
Hi Yury,
I'm just starting my exploration into using async/await; all my
'real-world' scenarios are currently hypothetical.
One such hypothetical scenario however is that if I have a server
process running, with some set of concurrent connection
On Jun 1, 2015, at 20:46, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> On 02.06.15 04:58, ned.deily wrote:
>> https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/30da21d2fa4f
>> changeset: 96458:30da21d2fa4f
>> branch: 2.7
>> parent: 96454:5e8fa1b13516
>> user:Ned Deily
>> date:Mon Jun 01 18:45:49 2015 -0
On 01.06.15 21:07, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On May 30, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Isn't it a time to assign release manager for 3.6-3.7?
Indeed! Please welcome Ned Deily as RM for 3.6:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0494/
Good news for all us! Ned many times saved me from
On 02.06.15 04:58, ned.deily wrote:
https://hg.python.org/cpython/rev/30da21d2fa4f
changeset: 96458:30da21d2fa4f
branch: 2.7
parent: 96454:5e8fa1b13516
user:Ned Deily
date:Mon Jun 01 18:45:49 2015 -0700
summary:
Issue #24357: Change host in socket.getaddrinfo examp
On 01/06/2015 19:33, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015, at 14:24, Stefan Behnel wrote:
Barry Warsaw schrieb am 01.06.2015 um 20:07:
On May 30, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Isn't it a time to assign release manager for 3.6-3.7?
Indeed! Please welcome Ned Deily as R
On 06/01/2015 11:09 AM, Barry Warsaw wrote:
Please welcome Ned Deily as RM for Python 3.6.
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0494/
We're in good hands. For two versions now Benjamin and Ned have been
quietly cleaning up my mistakes after (nearly) every release. My guess
is, Ned won't both
2015-05-31 16:15 GMT+02:00 Nick Coghlan :
> On 31 May 2015 at 19:07, Ludovic Gasc wrote:
> > About Python 3 migration, I think that one of our best control stick is
> > newcomers, and by extension, Python trainers/teachers.
> > If newcomers learn first Python 3, when they will start to work
> > p
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 5:05 AM, Skip Montanaro wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
>>
>> I thought I was volunteering to get a pony. I was misinformed.
>
>
> Ned,
>
> Not to worry. I'm sure that by the time 3.6a0 is due, the PSF will be able to
> scrape together the fu
On 1 June 2015 at 20:21, Steve Dower wrote:
> You need the original exe and can pass /uninstall to that.
OK, that's cool. Looks like I missed that in the docs. (Checks) Yes, I did :-(
Paul
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.
You need the original exe and can pass /uninstall to that.
There is an uninstall entry in the registry that uses the cached version of the
exe (via Programs and Features), but I don't know why WMI doesn't see it. I'll
check that out a bit later.
You can uninstall with the web installer exe, and
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 1:35 PM, Ned Deily wrote:
> I thought I was volunteering to get a pony. I was misinformed.
Ned,
Not to worry. I'm sure that by the time 3.6a0 is due, the PSF will be able
to scrape together the funds for a pony, perhaps even one with super powers:
Skip
__
> On Jun 1, 2015, at 11:33, Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015, at 14:24, Stefan Behnel wrote:
>> Barry Warsaw schrieb am 01.06.2015 um 20:07:
>>> On May 30, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
Isn't it a time to assign release manager for 3.6-3.7?
>>>
>>> Indeed!
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015, at 14:24, Stefan Behnel wrote:
> Barry Warsaw schrieb am 01.06.2015 um 20:07:
> > On May 30, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
> >> Isn't it a time to assign release manager for 3.6-3.7?
> >
> > Indeed! Please welcome Ned Deily as RM for 3.6:
> >
> > https://www.p
> On Jun 1, 2015, at 11:04, Yury Selivanov wrote:
>
> It looks like we now have two 3.6 release PEPs: 494 & 495
Sorry about the confusion. The second checkin (for 495) has been reverted; PEP
494 will be the ongoing PEP.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Barry Warsaw schrieb am 01.06.2015 um 20:07:
> On May 30, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>> Isn't it a time to assign release manager for 3.6-3.7?
>
> Indeed! Please welcome Ned Deily as RM for 3.6:
>
> https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0494/
Does he know already?
Stefan
__
On May 30, 2015, at 10:09 AM, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>Isn't it a time to assign release manager for 3.6-3.7?
Indeed! Please welcome Ned Deily as RM for 3.6:
https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-0494/
Cheers,
-Barry
pgpArSFCqg7XM.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
It looks like we now have two 3.6 release PEPs: 494 & 495
Yury
On 2015-06-01 1:59 PM, barry.warsaw wrote:
https://hg.python.org/peps/rev/a50d51e8c748
changeset: 5888:a50d51e8c748
user:Barry Warsaw
date:Mon Jun 01 13:59:32 2015 -0400
summary:
We have a 3.6 release PEP.
fil
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:09:37 -0400
Benjamin Peterson wrote:
>
> I thought all the slots were supposed to be available through the stable
> ABI, since you need them to properly define c types.
You're right, I was thinking specifically about the ABI versioning
issues (which I exposed in my reply t
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015, at 11:33, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:38:35 +0200
> Petr Viktorin wrote:
> > Hello,
> > The new test_importlib.extension.test_loader is currently leaking
> > references, (issue24268). There is a simple hack to stop this, but I'm
> > inclined to not apply qu
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 17:52:13 +0200
Petr Viktorin wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:38:35 +0200
> > Petr Viktorin wrote:
> [...]
> >> The nice way out would be taking advantage of PEP 442: xxlimited.Xxo
> >> can ditch tp_dealloc in favor of tp
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:33 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:38:35 +0200
> Petr Viktorin wrote:
[...]
>> The nice way out would be taking advantage of PEP 442: xxlimited.Xxo
>> can ditch tp_dealloc in favor of tp_traverse and tp_finalize (the
>> former of which it needs anyway to
On Mon, 1 Jun 2015 16:38:35 +0200
Petr Viktorin wrote:
> Hello,
> The new test_importlib.extension.test_loader is currently leaking
> references, (issue24268). There is a simple hack to stop this, but I'm
> inclined to not apply quick hacks and rather dig into the root cause.
> (It's a test module
Hello,
The new test_importlib.extension.test_loader is currently leaking
references, (issue24268). There is a simple hack to stop this, but I'm
inclined to not apply quick hacks and rather dig into the root cause.
(It's a test module, the refleaks are relatively harmless.)
The tests are based dire
I'm trying to script a command line uninstall of Python 3.5. The new
installer has a nice well-documented command line interface, but
there's nothing much about how to uninstall.
Looking at the installed products, I see
>get-wmiobject Win32_Product -filter 'name like "Python 3.5.0b2%"' | select N
Hello,
On Mon, 01 Jun 2015 13:14:27 +0200
"M.-A. Lemburg" wrote:
[]
> > The "7.0x faster" number on speed.pypy.org would be significantly
> > *higher* if we upgraded the baseline to 2.7.10 now.
>
> If someone were to volunteer to set up and run speed.python.org,
> I think we could add some add
On 01.06.2015 12:44, Armin Rigo wrote:
> Hi Larry,
>
> On 31 May 2015 at 01:20, Larry Hastings wrote:
>> p.s. Supporting this patch also helps cut into PyPy's reported performance
>> lead--that is, if they ever upgrade speed.pypy.org from comparing against
>> Python *2.7.2*.
>
> Right, we should
Hi Larry,
On 31 May 2015 at 01:20, Larry Hastings wrote:
> p.s. Supporting this patch also helps cut into PyPy's reported performance
> lead--that is, if they ever upgrade speed.pypy.org from comparing against
> Python *2.7.2*.
Right, we should do this upgrade when 2.7.11 is out.
There is some
Thanks Larry, and my apologies to the release team for the extra work!
Regards,
Nick.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/a
28 matches
Mail list logo
