On 6/19/2015 11:21 AM, triccare triccare wrote:
Will this PEP be implemented in Python 2?
"Version: 3.3"
Enhancements are not backported
And, more generally, is there a way to know the extent of implementation
of any particular PEP?
When a PEP is accepted, the version field should be upda
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2015-06-12 - 2015-06-19)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open4892 ( +8)
closed 31342 (+25)
total 36234 (+33)
Open issues wit
On 06/19/2015 11:21 AM, triccare triccare wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> Will this PEP be implemented in Python 2?
>
> And, more generally, is there a way to know the extent of implementation
> of any particular PEP?
PEP 420 (namespace packages) will not be implemented in Python 2.
I don't think there
Greetings,
Will this PEP be implemented in Python 2?
And, more generally, is there a way to know the extent of implementation of
any particular PEP?
Thank you for your time.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mail
Hi everyone,
I was really happy to see PEP 492 - that is really a big step forward.
It makes many programming constructs possible in combination with
asyncio, which have been cumbersome or impossible until now.
One thing that still is impossible is to have __setitem__ be used
asynchronously. As a
