On 22 June 2015 at 08:46, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
>
>
> On 21 June 2015 at 22:05, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Ivan Levkivskyi
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> It is still not clear whether Guido's comment still stands for not
>>> raising an UnboundLocalError in class definitio
On 21 June 2015 at 22:05, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>
> On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Ivan Levkivskyi
wrote:
>>
>> It is still not clear whether Guido's comment still stands for not
raising an UnboundLocalError in class definitions but using globals instead.
>
>
> Can you phrase this in the form
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 6:22 PM, Ivan Levkivskyi
wrote:
> It is still not clear whether Guido's comment still stands for not raising
> an UnboundLocalError in class definitions but using globals instead.
>
Can you phrase this in the form of an example, showing what it currently
does and what you
On 20 June 2015 at 18:39, Ron Adam wrote:
>
>
> On 06/20/2015 12:12 PM, Ron Adam wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 06/20/2015 02:51 AM, Ivan Levkivskyi wrote:
>>
>
> Guido said 13 years ago that this behavior should not be changed:
>>> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-April/023428.html,
>>>
On Sat, 20 Jun 2015 21:16:48 +0200
"M.-A. Lemburg" wrote:
> On 20.06.2015 09:30, Victor Stinner wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I didn't get much feedback on this PEP. Since the Python 3.6 branch is
> > open (default), it's probably better to push such change in the
> > beginning of the 3.6 cycle, to catc
On Sun, Jun 21, 2015 at 12:48 AM, Greg Ewing
wrote:
> Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
>> What if we're assigning to
>> multiple targets, do the run in parallel? How is tuple unpacking
>> handled? How is augmented assignment handled?
>>
>> If we allow asynchronous assignment, do we allow asynchronous deleti
