Okay I'll try.
Thanks
> On Jul 9, 2015, at 20:24, Ethan Furman wrote:
>
> On 07/09/2015 10:34 AM, Cyril Scetbon wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> Greetings!
>
> You have found the gathering place of the Python Developers -- as in, we
> discuss the development /of/ Python, not developing /with/ Python.
>
On 07/09/2015 10:34 AM, Cyril Scetbon wrote:
[...]
Greetings!
You have found the gathering place of the Python Developers -- as in, we
discuss the development /of/ Python, not developing /with/ Python.
You should ask your question on python-list, and perhaps on distutils-sig.
Good luck!
--
Hi,
I use pip to install modules and setuptools to install dependencies, and
generate a console_script using the entry_point parameter of setup.
Here is the issue :
my current sources depend on modules, let's say A=1.0, B=1.0, C=2.0. And C
depends on B=1.1
I have no problem with using pip to in
On Thu, Jul 9, 2015 at 7:41 AM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Serhiy Storchaka
> wrote:
>>
>> On 08.07.15 01:45, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>>>
>>> P.S. I don't think python-dev post was necessary or helpful (and I still
>>> haven't had a chance to read the whole thre
On Jul 09, 2015, at 08:47 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>That strikes me as just the kind of
>not-quite-as-finished-as-we-thought case that the beta cycle is
>designed to flush out, so the minor further enhancement sounds like a
>good idea to me.
Cool. RDM provided some good feedback in the review, so
On 2015-07-09 15:29, Christian Heimes wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this just came in. According to Zachary all Windows builds use 1.0.2c.
> The version is vulnerable to a critical bug in the CA validation code of
> OpenSSL. The bug can be abused to turn any valid server certificate into
> a CA cert.
>
> We s
Hi,
this just came in. According to Zachary all Windows builds use 1.0.2c.
The version is vulnerable to a critical bug in the CA validation code of
OpenSSL. The bug can be abused to turn any valid server certificate into
a CA cert.
We should consider a security release of Python ASAP.
Alternat
On Thu, 9 Jul 2015 20:57:33 +1000
Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> As Guido suggested, would you be willing to take on the BDFL-Delegate
> task for this? It definitely seems appropriate given the errors and
> omissions you've already found :)
Fine. I'll take a look again and come up with questions, if I
On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 10:19 PM, Serhiy Storchaka
wrote:
> On 08.07.15 01:45, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
>> P.S. I don't think python-dev post was necessary or helpful (and I still
>> haven't had a chance to read the whole thread). It would have been
>> sufficient to assign the tracker entry ba
On 8 July 2015 at 00:42, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> In this case, though, I was a bit miffed since I didn't notice that
> PEP appearing on python-ideas (or perhaps I already forget discussing
> it?), which made me frustrated that *perhaps* with less pointless
> drifting I would have seen it. Being on
On 8 July 2015 at 05:12, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Jul 07, 2015, at 02:53 PM, Terry Reedy wrote:
>
>>To me, the main question is whether you are sure that your proposal is the
>>right fix, or whether you might reasonably do something different (with the
>>new arguments) if changes were reverted for
11 matches
Mail list logo
