On 17 August 2015 at 05:34, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-08-16 7:21 GMT-07:00 Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com:
2. By far and away the most common use for me would be things like
print(fIteration {n}: Took {end-start) seconds). At the moment I use
str,format() for this,
On 08/17/2015 03:02 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
On 17 August 2015 at 05:34, Victor Stinner victor.stin...@gmail.com wrote:
2015-08-16 7:21 GMT-07:00 Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com:
3. All of the complex examples look scary, but in practice I wouldn't
write stuff like that - why would anyone do so
On 17 August 2015 at 12:48, Larry Hastings la...@hastings.org wrote:
I think this corner of the debate is covered by the Consenting adults
guiding principle we use 'round these parts.
Precisely.
Paul
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:37 PM, Robert Collins
robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 26 July 2015 at 07:28, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
For my part, I'm going to pick up more or less one thing a day and
review it, but I think it would be great if other committers were to
Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net writes:
However - 9 isn't a bad number for 'patches that the triagers think
are ready to commit' inventory.
So yay!. Also - triagers, thank you for feeding patches through the
process. Please keep it up :)
If I were a cheerleader I would be able to
Barry Warsaw writes:
On Aug 17, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
print(fIteration {n}: Took {end-start) seconds)
This illustrates (more) problems I have with arbitrary expressions.
First, you've actually made a typo there; it should be
{end-start} -- notice the trailing
On 17Aug2015 0813, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Aug 18, 2015, at 12:58 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
The linters could tell you that you have no 'end' or 'start' just as
easily when it's in that form as when it's written out in full.
Certainly the mismatched brackets could easily be caught by any sort
On 17Aug2015 1506, Steve Dower wrote:
On 17Aug2015 0813, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Aug 18, 2015, at 12:58 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
The linters could tell you that you have no 'end' or 'start' just as
easily when it's in that form as when it's written out in full.
Certainly the mismatched
On Aug 17, 2015 2:23 PM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
On Aug 16 2015, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
2. By far and away the most common use for me would be things like
print(fIteration {n}: Took {end-start) seconds).
I believe an even more common use willl be
On 26 July 2015 at 07:28, Robert Collins robe...@robertcollins.net wrote:
On 21 July 2015 at 19:40, Nick Coghlan ncogh...@gmail.com wrote:
All of this is why the chart that I believe should be worrying people
is the topmost one on this page:
http://bugs.python.org/issue?@template=stats
Both
On 2015-08-17 23:06, Steve Dower wrote:
On 17Aug2015 0813, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On Aug 18, 2015, at 12:58 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
The linters could tell you that you have no 'end' or 'start' just as
easily when it's in that form as when it's written out in full.
Certainly the mismatched
[Posted on Python-Dev]
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 3:23 PM, Guido van Rossum gu...@python.org wrote:
I think that a courtesy message to python-dev is appropriate, with a link to
the PEP and an invitation to discuss its merits on datetime-sig.
Per Gudo's advise, this is an invitation to join PEP
On Aug 17, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
print(fIteration {n}: Took {end-start) seconds)
This illustrates (more) problems I have with arbitrary expressions.
First, you've actually made a typo there; it should be {end-start} -- notice
the trailing curly brace. Second, what if you
On 08/16/2015 03:37 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 8:55 PM, Eric V. Smith e...@trueblade.com
mailto:e...@trueblade.com wrote:
Thanks, Paul. Good feedback.
Indeed, I smiled when I saw Paul's post.
Triple quoted and raw strings work like you'd expect, but
On Aug 18, 2015, at 12:58 AM, Chris Angelico wrote:
The linters could tell you that you have no 'end' or 'start' just as
easily when it's in that form as when it's written out in full.
Certainly the mismatched brackets could easily be caught by any sort
of syntax highlighter. The rules for
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 12:50 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
On Aug 17, 2015, at 11:02 AM, Paul Moore wrote:
print(fIteration {n}: Took {end-start) seconds)
This illustrates (more) problems I have with arbitrary expressions.
First, you've actually made a typo there; it should
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Eric V. Smith e...@trueblade.com wrote:
[...]
My current plan is to replace an f-string with a call to .format_map:
foo = 100
bar = 20
f'foo: {foo} bar: { bar+1}'
Would become:
'foo: {foo} bar: { bar+1}'.format_map({'foo': 100, ' bar+1': 21})
The
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 8:13 AM, Barry Warsaw ba...@python.org wrote:
I'm really asking whether it's technically feasible and realistically
possible
for them to do so. I'd love to hear from the maintainers of pyflakes,
pylint,
Emacs, vim, and other editors, linters, and other static
On Aug 16 2015, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
2. By far and away the most common use for me would be things like
print(fIteration {n}: Took {end-start) seconds).
I believe an even more common use willl be
print(fIteration {n+1}: Took {end-start} seconds)
Note that not allowing
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 12:23 PM, Nikolaus Rath nikol...@rath.org wrote:
On Aug 16 2015, Paul Moore p.f.mo...@gmail.com wrote:
2. By far and away the most common use for me would be things like
print(fIteration {n}: Took {end-start) seconds).
I believe an even more common use willl be
How is this proposal of di... more than a different spelling of lambda
i...? (I think it's a great idea — but am wondering if there are some
extra semantics that I missed)
I don't think there's any need to preserve the values of the {...} (or
${...}) constituents — the normal closure mechanism
On 8/17/2015 2:24 PM, Guido van Rossum wrote:
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 7:13 AM, Eric V. Smith e...@trueblade.com
mailto:e...@trueblade.com wrote:
[...]
My current plan is to replace an f-string with a call to .format_map:
foo = 100
bar = 20
f'foo: {foo} bar: {
On Mon, Aug 17, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Eric V. Smith e...@trueblade.com wrote:
[...]
I think it would be possible to create a version of this that works for
both i18n and regular interpolation. I think the open issues are:
1. Barry wants the substitutions to look like $identifier and possibly
23 matches
Mail list logo
