On 27.10.2015 22:19, Eric V. Smith wrote:
On Oct 27, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
On 27/10/2015 18:39, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 26.10.2015 20:54, Ethan Furman wrote:
You misunderstand -- the order of string prefixes does *not* matter,
so forcing us to use one is silly.
I don't think
On Oct 27, 2015, at 4:39 PM, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>
>> On 27/10/2015 18:39, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
>>> On 26.10.2015 20:54, Ethan Furman wrote:
>>> You misunderstand -- the order of string prefixes does *not* matter,
>>> so forcing us to use one is silly.
>>
>> I don't think so.
>>
>> It's better
On 27/10/2015 18:39, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
On 26.10.2015 20:54, Ethan Furman wrote:
You misunderstand -- the order of string prefixes does *not* matter,
so forcing us to use one is silly.
I don't think so.
It's better to have less possibilities in the beginning. So later on, we
can easily rela
On 26.10.2015 20:54, Ethan Furman wrote:
You misunderstand -- the order of string prefixes does *not* matter,
so forcing us to use one is silly.
I don't think so.
It's better to have less possibilities in the beginning. So later on, we
can easily relax the restrictions without breaking compat
