> On May 5, 2016, at 8:35 PM, David Wilson wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:03:48AM +, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
>>Is there something to contemplate in here? I dislike posting questions
>>instead of answers, but it seems apparent there is a problem here and it
>>continues to re
Brett Cannon python.org> writes:
> This is whole thread is off-topic precisely because all of this is
discussed -- in the open -- on distutils-sig and decided there. If people
feel changes need to be made like broadcasting to a wider audience when a
change occurs, then please bring it up on distut
On Fri, May 06, 2016 at 12:03:48AM +, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Is there something to contemplate in here? I dislike posting questions
> instead of answers, but it seems apparent there is a problem here and it
> continues to remain unaddressed.
> This is whole thread is off-topic prec
Donald Stufft stufft.io> writes:
> > Technically, he
> > didn't gloat, but suddenly legal advice was apparently readily available.
> >
> > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/m3-cdecimal
> >
>
> I'm not going to respond to the rest of this, because I don't think it's
> possible for you and me to have
On Thu, 5 May 2016 at 16:00 Mark Lawrence via Python-Dev <
python-dev@python.org> wrote:
> On 05/05/2016 23:22, Stefan Krah wrote
> >
> > Fredrik Lundh is also affected (and might not have received any mail,
> > same as me):
> >
> > https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PIL
> >
>
> He might be, but clear
On Thu, 5 May 2016 at 16:54 David Wilson wrote:
> This is mostly just observational, and not meant primarily as criticism
> of the fabulous work of Donald and others (ignoring pypa, also the
> prompt, reliable, and skilled support responses common on such places as
> IRC), however I can't help bu
This is mostly just observational, and not meant primarily as criticism
of the fabulous work of Donald and others (ignoring pypa, also the
prompt, reliable, and skilled support responses common on such places as
IRC), however I can't help but notice that PyPI governance seems to come
under fire vas
On 06/05/2016 00:06, Barry Warsaw wrote:
On May 05, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Mark Lawrence via Python-Dev wrote:
On 05/05/2016 23:22, Stefan Krah wrote
Fredrik Lundh is also affected (and might not have received any mail,
same as me):
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PIL
Maybe, but then there's th
Chris Barker noaa.gov> writes:
> Indeed -- Fredrik never made any effort to support pypi, pip, etc. --
that's why the Pillow fork was started in the first place.
Maybe, but he created PIL, so thank you, Fredrik!
Stefan Krah
___
Python-Dev mailing lis
> On May 5, 2016, at 6:22 PM, Stefan Krah wrote:
>
> Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
>> I know you're not happy with myself and the other distutils-sig folks
>> regarding the decision to deprecate and remove automatic link
>> spidering,
>
> More accurately: Not happy with the removal of the ch
On May 05, 2016, at 11:58 PM, Mark Lawrence via Python-Dev wrote:
>On 05/05/2016 23:22, Stefan Krah wrote
>>
>> Fredrik Lundh is also affected (and might not have received any mail,
>> same as me):
>>
>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PIL
Maybe, but then there's the friendly fork:
https://pypi.p
>
> Fredrik Lundh is also affected (and might not have received any mail,
>> same as me):
>>
>> https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PIL
>>
>>
> He might be, but clearly the Python community as a whole is not impacted.
> From what I see the latest version of PIL that is available is 1.1.6, which
> requir
On 05/05/2016 23:22, Stefan Krah wrote
Fredrik Lundh is also affected (and might not have received any mail,
same as me):
https://pypi.python.org/pypi/PIL
He might be, but clearly the Python community as a whole is not
impacted. From what I see the latest version of PIL that is available
Nick Coghlan gmail.com> writes:
> I know you're not happy with myself and the other distutils-sig folks
> regarding the decision to deprecate and remove automatic link
> spidering,
More accurately: Not happy with the removal of the checksummed "explicit"
mode. What I would have preferred is a Fre
Well, the stack trace was pointing to the line that called Tesseract, so I
figured that was the problem.
--
Ryan
[ERROR]: Your autotools build scripts are 200 lines longer than your
program. Something’s wrong.
http://kirbyfan64.github.io/
On May 5, 2016 11:24 AM, "MRAB" wrote:
>
> It looks to me
Here is something I wrote because I was also unsatisfied with byteplay's
API: https://github.com/zachariahreed/byteasm. Maybe it's useful in a
discussion of "minimum viable" api for bytecode manipulation.
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.o
On Thu, May 05, 2016 at 05:23:02PM +0100, MRAB wrote:
> On 2016-05-05 16:26, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
> >On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Deepak Srivastava
[ ... about three or four pages of quoting ... ]
> >Questions like this are better suited for python-list. [...]
> It looks to me that it's the u
On 2016-05-05 16:26, Ryan Gonzalez wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Deepak Srivastava
mailto:d.srivastav...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Dear All,
I am new to python and very much excited to learn this technology.
I have done setup of python 3.5.1 with PyCharm community edition
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 3:24 AM, Deepak Srivastava
wrote:
>
> Dear All,
>
> I am new to python and very much excited to learn this technology.
>
> I have done setup of python 3.5.1 with PyCharm community edition on
> windows 7(64bit service pack 1).
>
> I am trying to execute some piece of code bu
> Dear All,
> I am new to python and very much excited to learn this technology.
> I have done setup of python 3.5.1 with PyCharm community edition on windows
> 7(64bit service pack 1).
> I am trying to execute some piece of code but it fails . Requesting you to
> please help.
>
> My Piece of
20 matches
Mail list logo
