On 2 July 2016 at 16:17, Ludovic Gasc wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> I fully understand that AsyncIO is a drop in the ocean of CPython, you're
> working to prepare the entire 3.5.3 release for December, not yet ready.
> However, you might create a 3.5.2.1 release with only this AsyncIO fix ?
That wou
Hi everybody,
I fully understand that AsyncIO is a drop in the ocean of CPython, you're
working to prepare the entire 3.5.3 release for December, not yet ready.
However, you might create a 3.5.2.1 release with only this AsyncIO fix ?
PEP 440 doesn't seem to forbid that even if I see only 3 digits
Hi list,
so this is the next round for PEP 487. During the last round, most of
the comments were in the direction that a two step approach for
integrating into Python, first in pure Python, later in C, was not a
great idea and everything should be in C directly. So I implemented it
in C, put it on
