On 16 July 2016 at 08:20, Steve Dower wrote:
> Backwards Compatibility
> ---
>
> Python 3.4 and earlier did not distinguish between 32-bit and 64-bit builds
> in
> ``sys.winver``. As a result, it is possible to have valid side-by-side
> installations of both 32-bit and 64-bit i
On 15Jul2016 1526, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I was going to delegate to our resident Windows expert, but that's you. :-(
Can you suggest someone else? I really don't want to swap in what I
once knew about the Windows registry...
He might not be pleased at the nomination, but Paul Moore would be
I was going to delegate to our resident Windows expert, but that's you. :-(
Can you suggest someone else? I really don't want to swap in what I
once knew about the Windows registry...
On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 3:20 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I'd like to get this PEP approved (status chang
Hi all
I'd like to get this PEP approved (status changed to Active, IIUC).
So far (to my knowledge), Anaconda is writing out the new metadata and
Visual Studio is reading it. Any changes to the schema now will require
somewhat public review anyway, so I don't see any harm in approving the
PEP
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2016-07-08 - 2016-07-15)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open5562 (+12)
closed 33715 (+39)
total 39277 (+51)
Open issues wit
