On 23Jul2016 1320, Guido van Rossum wrote:
I'll let Paul pronounce. But you should probably have a BDFL-Delegate:
... header.
Yeah, my headers are a bit outdated... I'm not even sure the $Revision$
and $Date$ variables are going to be substituted anymore (unless it's a
pep2html thing rather t
I'll let Paul pronounce. But you should probably have a BDFL-Delegate:
... header.
On Sat, Jul 23, 2016 at 12:16 PM, Steve Dower wrote:
> PEP 514 is now ready for pronouncement, so this is the last chance for any
> feedback (BDFL-delegate Paul has been active on the github PR, so I don't
> expect
PEP 514 is now ready for pronouncement, so this is the last chance for
any feedback (BDFL-delegate Paul has been active on the github PR, so I
don't expect he has a lot of feedback left).
The most major change from the previous post is the addition of some
code examples at the end. Honestly, I
On 2016-07-23 05:23, Tian JiaLin wrote:
Hey Guys,
I found the mistake I made, basically I'm using a tool called Sentry to
capture the exceptions.
The value returned from the Python is 2^64-1, which is -1
from mysql_affected_rows.
Sentry is using JSON format as the a kind of storage, apparently t
On Sat, 23 Jul 2016 at 05:27 Ronald Oussoren wrote:
> [SNIP]
>
> What is the best way forward after that? As before this is a change in
> behavior that, unsurprisingly, few core devs appear to be comfortable with
> evaluating, combined with new functionality that will likely see little use
> be
On Fri, 22 Jul 2016 at 22:11 Benjamin Peterson wrote:
> Should we just make the RTD one canonical and serve redirects on
> docs.python.org?
>
My hope was to eventually have dev.python.org point at the RTFD instance,
but I'm not up for spearheading that ATM and I would want the PSF to pay
for a g
FYI there is also a bug tracker report about this:
https://bugs.python.org/issue27587
On 23 July 2016 at 13:22, Christian Heimes wrote:
> On 2016-07-22 16:36, Guido van Rossum wrote:
>> Somebody did some research and found some bugs in CPython (IIUC). The
>> published some questionable fragments.
On 2016-07-22 16:36, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> Somebody did some research and found some bugs in CPython (IIUC). The
> published some questionable fragments. If there's a volunteer we could
> probably easily fix these. (I know we already have occasional Coverity
> scans and there are other tools to
Hi,
It’s getting a tradition for me to work on PEP 447 during the EuroPython
sprints and disappear afterwards. Hopefully I can manage to avoid the latter
step this year…
Last year the conclusion appeared to be that this is an acceptable PEP, but
Mark Shannon had a concern about a default imple
