On 2017-01-27 22:15, Michael Felt wrote:
On 27/01/2017 22:24, MRAB wrote:
> I'm not bothered about it. It's quite a bit bigger than the re module,
> and, anyway, keeping it as a third-party module gives me more freedom
> to make updates, which are available for a range of Python versions.
I
On 27/01/2017 22:24, MRAB wrote:
I'm not bothered about it. It's quite a bit bigger than the re module,
and, anyway, keeping it as a third-party module gives me more freedom
to make updates, which are available for a range of Python versions.
I tried packaging it (pip build) and ran into a
On 2017-01-27 17:03, Łukasz Langa wrote:
On Jan 26, 2017, at 5:16 PM, MRAB > wrote:
So, it seems as if regex already uses a better algorithm although I
couldn't find any reference to any regex theoretical framework like dfa,
On 27/01/2017 17:03, Łukasz Langa wrote:
On Jan 26, 2017, at 5:16 PM, MRAB > wrote:
So, it seems as if regex already uses a better algorithm although I
couldn't find any reference to any regex theoretical framework like dfa,
ACTIVITY SUMMARY (2017-01-20 - 2017-01-27)
Python tracker at http://bugs.python.org/
To view or respond to any of the issues listed below, click on the issue.
Do NOT respond to this message.
Issues counts and deltas:
open5768 (+13)
closed 35368 (+33)
total 41136 (+46)
Open issues
> On Jan 26, 2017, at 5:16 PM, MRAB wrote:
>> So, it seems as if regex already uses a better algorithm although I
>> couldn't find any reference to any regex theoretical framework like dfa,
>> nfa, thompson multiple-state simulation or something.
>>
> It still uses