On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 4:13 PM, Sven R. Kunze wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> I recently refreshed regular expressions theoretical basics *indulging in
> reminiscences* So, I read https://swtch.com/~rsc/regexp/regexp1.html
>
> However, reaching the chart in the lower third of the article, I saw Python
> 2
Cory Benfield writes:
> The TL;DR is: I understand Christian’s concern, but I don’t think
> it’s important if you’re very, very careful.
But AIUI, the "you" above is the end-user or admin of end-user's
system, no? We know that they aren't very careful (or perhaps more
accurate, this is too fsc
+1
We'd like to get more details on how to try this "new mode", and do a
full/comprehensive comparison between the "re" vs "regex".
Peter
-Original Message-
From: Victor Stinner [mailto:victor.stin...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2017 12:58 PM
To: Lukasz Langa
Cc: Wang,
2017-02-01 20:42 GMT+01:00 Lukasz Langa :
> However, this benchmark is incomplete in the sense that it only checks the
> compatibility mode of `regex`, whereas it's the new mode that lends the
> biggest performance gains. So, providing checks for the other engine would
> show us the full picture.
On 31.01.17 21:40, Wang, Peter Xihong wrote:
Regarding to the performance difference between "re" and "regex" and packaging
related options, we did a performance comparison using Python 3.6.0 to run some micro-benchmarks in
the Python Benchmark Suite (https://github.com/python/performance):
Re
> On Jan 31, 2017, at 11:40 AM, Wang, Peter Xihong
> wrote:
>
> Regarding to the performance difference between "re" and "regex" and
> packaging related options, we did a performance comparison using Python 3.6.0
> to run some micro-benchmarks in the Python Benchmark Suite
> (https://github.
Hi,
I noticed a strange issue with Roundup Robot on the issue #29318.
I closed http://bugs.python.org/issue29318 as rejected:
resolution: -> rejected
status: open -> closed
Roundup Robot made a first change:
stage: -> resolved
But then it made a second change:
resolution: rejec
On Wed, 1 Feb 2017 03:23:02 -0500
Philippe Proulx wrote:
>
> It feels like `bread` is never deleted in the module initialization
> situation, but I don't know why: the only reference to the Bread Python
> object is this `bread` name in the module... what could prevent this
> object's __del__() me
Hello. I'm not sure if I'm posting to the right list. If it's not the
case, please tell me which one to post to.
Using Python 3.5.2.
I'm developing a C module with the help of SWIG. My library manages
objects with reference counting, much like Python, except that it's
deterministic: there's no GC
Inada-san,
I have made a PR for typing module upstream
https://github.com/python/typing/pull/383
It should reduce the memory consumption significantly (and also increase
isinstance() speed).
Could you please try it with your real code base and test memory
consumption (and maybe speed) as compared
> On 1 Feb 2017, at 14:20, Steve Dower wrote:
>
> Sorry, I misspoke when I said "certificate validation callback", I meant the
> same callback Cory uses below (name escapes me now, but it's unfortunately
> similar to what I said). There are two callbacks in OpenSSL, one that allows
> you to v
Sorry, I misspoke when I said "certificate validation callback", I meant the
same callback Cory uses below (name escapes me now, but it's unfortunately
similar to what I said). There are two callbacks in OpenSSL, one that allows
you to verify each certificate in the chain individually, and one t
> On 31 Jan 2017, at 18:26, Steve Dower wrote:
>
> In short, I want to allow Python code to set OpenSSL's certificate validation
> callback. Basically, given a raw certificate, return True/False based on
> whether it should be trusted. I then have separate code (yet to be published)
> impleme
Hey all, it's Google Summer of Code time again!
For those not familiar with it, Google Summer of Code is a mentoring
program where Google provides stipends to pay students to work with
selected open source organizations. Python has participated for many
years now, and we're hoping to be selec
14 matches
Mail list logo
