Re: [Python-Dev] Deterministic builds of the interpreter

Hi Armin, Thank you for your explanation. I've now managed to build 2.7 and 3.5 deterministic by recompiling the bytecode at the end of the build (and excluding 2to3). Freddy On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 9:30 AM, Armin Rigo wrote: > Hi Freddy, > > On 16 February 2017 at

Re: [Python-Dev] Deterministic builds of the interpreter

Hi Freddy, On 16 February 2017 at 18:03, Freddy Rietdijk wrote: > As I mentioned, it seems only sets cause unreproducible > bytecode. Sets have no order. But when generating the bytecode, I would > expect there would still be an order since the code isn't actually