On 2 March 2017 at 02:29, Barry Warsaw wrote:
> On Mar 01, 2017, at 10:55 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>
> >I suggest to create 3rd party modules on PyPI. It became easy to pull
> >dependencies using pip and virtualenv.
> >
> >It seems like https://github.com/aio-libs is the home of many asyncio
> >
Hello,
Le 01/03/2017 à 20:40, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 20:24:03 +0100
> Louis Bouchard wrote:
>>
>> Indeed, this is something that is in the history of the LP bug so here is the
>> URL where those comparison can be found :
>>
>> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MyNBPVZ
Hi,
Your document doesn't explain how you configured the host to run
benchmarks. Maybe you didn't tune Linux or anything else? Be careful
with modern hardware which can make funny (or not) surprises. See my
recent talk at FOSDEM (last month):
"How to run a stable benchmark"
https://fosdem.org/201
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 20:24:03 +0100
Louis Bouchard wrote:
>
> Indeed, this is something that is in the history of the LP bug so here is the
> URL where those comparison can be found :
>
> https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MyNBPVZlBeic1OLqVKe_bcPk2deO_pQs9trIfOFefM0/edit#gid=2034603487
Some
Hello,
Le 01/03/2017 à 18:51, Antoine Pitrou a écrit :
> On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:28:24 -0500
> Barry Warsaw wrote:
>>
>> Louis (Cc'd here) has done a ton of work to measure and analyze the problem,
>> but we've more or less hit a roadblock, so we're taking the issue public to
>> see if anybody on t
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 19:58:14 +0100
Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 01.03.2017 18:51, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> > As for the high level: what if the training set used for PGO in Xenial
> > has become skewed or inadequate?
>
> running the testsuite
I did some tests a year or two ago, and running the who
On 01.03.2017 18:51, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> As for the high level: what if the training set used for PGO in Xenial
> has become skewed or inadequate?
running the testsuite
___
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailma
This mailing list is for the development **of** Python, not **with** it.
For build failures like this it's best to ask on python-list (and if you
search for the missing libintl_* symbols you will find they come from
gettext).
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 at 08:10 Porel, Subrata wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
>
>
> W
On Wed, 1 Mar 2017 12:28:24 -0500
Barry Warsaw wrote:
>
> Louis (Cc'd here) has done a ton of work to measure and analyze the problem,
> but we've more or less hit a roadblock, so we're taking the issue public to
> see if anybody on this mailing list has further ideas. A detailed analysis is
> a
Hello all,
Over in Ubuntu, we've gotten reports about some performance regressions in
Python 2.7 when moving from Trusty (14.04 LTS) to Xenial (16.04 LTS).
Trusty's version is based on 2.7.6 while Xenial's version is based on 2.7.12
with bits of .13 cherry picked.
We've not been able to identify
On Mar 01, 2017, at 10:55 AM, Victor Stinner wrote:
>I suggest to create 3rd party modules on PyPI. It became easy to pull
>dependencies using pip and virtualenv.
>
>It seems like https://github.com/aio-libs is the home of many asyncio
>libraries.
This is what we did for aiosmtpd, an asyncio-base
Hi Team,
While trying to compile the Python-3.6.0 in our Solaris 10 server to install
this beside python 2.6.4 we have got below error: Please help on this.
root@xxyyzz:/opt/Python-3.6.0#python
Python 2.6.4 (r264:75706, Jun 27 2012, 05:45:50) [C] on sunos5
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or
On 1 March 2017 at 15:34, Yury Selivanov wrote:
> +1 to put both in contextlib.
With the proviso that the implementation shouldn't depend on asyncio.
As Yury says, it should be framework agnostic, let's be careful to
make that the case and not rely on helpers from asyncio, either
deliberately or
On 2017-03-01 2:16 AM, Nathaniel Smith wrote:
On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Short version:
- there are some reasonable requests for async variants of contextlib APIs
for 3.7
- prompted by Raymond, I'm thinking it actually makes more sense to add
these in a new `asyncio
Big +1 here, and an implicit -1 on the other suggestions.
asyncio != async/await
Cheers,
Steve
Top-posted from my Windows Phone
-Original Message-
From: "Nathaniel Smith"
Sent: 2/28/2017 23:19
To: "Nick Coghlan"
Cc: "python-dev@python.org"
Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] API design: wh
On 2017-03-01 12:42 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
Short version:
- there are some reasonable requests for async variants of contextlib APIs
for 3.7
- prompted by Raymond, I'm thinking it actually makes more sense to add
these in a new `asyncio.contextlib` module than it does to add them
directly to
Please don't put code using asyncio in Python stdlib yet. The Python
language is still changing rapidly to get new async features
(async/await keywords, async generators, etc.), and asyncio also
evolved quickly.
I suggest to create 3rd party modules on PyPI. It became easy to pull
dependencies usi
17 matches
Mail list logo
