On Tue, 4 Apr 2017 at 04:58 Julien Palard wrote:
> Hi, little follow-up about this PEP.
>
>
> Please check with the PSF that this is what we really want. In the past
> the suggestion has been to **not** use the PSF license with all of its
> historical baggage but instead use something like Apache
Hi, little follow-up about this PEP.
Please check with the PSF that this is what we really want. In the past the
suggestion has been to **not** use the PSF license with all of its historical
baggage but instead use something like Apache. But since IANAL we really should
ask the PSF what the bes
